Voting and Immigrants’ Rights Advocates Sue Over New Florida Law That Targets Voter Registration, Civic Engagement, and Political Speech
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Voting and immigrants’ rights advocates filed a federal lawsuit today challenging a new Florida law, SB 7050, that targets community-based organizations performing voter registration.
The case specifically focuses on the law’s non-citizen provision, which would impose a $50,000 fine on an organization for each non-citizen person who “collects” or “handles” voter registration forms on the organization’s behalf. This would almost certainly put out of business a great number of community-based groups that rely on a combination of citizens and non-citizens as staff and volunteers for their voter registration programs.
The provision’s restrictions also target lawful permanent residents, many of whom have longtime, close ties to the communities in which they reside.
The lawsuit, which hones in on SB 7050’s chilling effect on political speech, civic engagement, and the unconstitutional exclusion of non-citizens from these activities, was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Florida, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Dēmos, and Arnold & Porter on behalf of the Hispanic Federation, Poder Latinx, and individual clients. It cites violations of the First and 14th Amendments.
The following comments are from:
Adriel I. Cepeda Derieux, deputy director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project: “This law is a clear attack on civic engagement and participation in our democratic process. It’s also discriminatory and unconstitutional. It will arbitrarily exclude all non-citizens — including longtime lawful permanent residents — from registering voters eligible to participate in our democracy. Its effect on our clients and the communities they live in and serve will be devastating. It cannot be allowed to stand.”
Estee M. Konor, associate director of litigation at Dēmos: “All Floridians — including non-citizens — have the right to participate in the work of building a better democracy through civic engagement. Our clients have been empowering the communities they serve through civic engagement for years. This law is a brazen attempt to shut down that powerful work by preventing non-citizens from assisting with voter registration efforts in their communities. Non-citizens are part of our communities, part of the body politic, and have a stake in political decisions that are made.”
Lourdes Rosado, president and general counsel at LatinoJustice PRLDEF: “Floridians who are simply trying to help others partake in their civic duty to vote are being penalized for their actions or barred from helping register voters because of where they were born. It is clear that SB 7050 is designed to discriminate against non-citizens and to undermine the ability of Latino civic organizations to do their jobs. Our challenge to this law aims to protect our communities’ rights to free association and to be free from discrimination.”
Daniel Tilley, legal director of the ACLU of Florida: “This law is yet another state-imposed obstruction to the promise of Amendment 4. This law will disproportionately impact Black and Hispanic voters who are much more likely to register to vote with community groups than white voters. Simply put, this law is bad for democracy.”
John A. Freedman, Arnold & Porter’s senior pro bono counsel: “Our nation’s armed forces have entrusted Dreamers and legal permanent residents to defend this country against enemies of democracy. But the state of Florida stands alone in prohibiting immigrants from helping our citizens register to vote. We are proud to stand with our clients and co-counsel to vindicate the rights of immigrants to help strengthen our democracy.”
The lawsuit, Hispanic Federation v. Byrd, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida in Tallahassee.
Complaint:
Spanish-language release: /press-releases/defensores-de-derechos-electorales-y-de-inmigrantes-demandan-a-florida-por-nueva-ley-que-ataca-el-registro-de-votantes-el-compromiso-civico-y-el-discurso-politico
Voting Rights
Hispanic Federation v. Byrd
Voting Rights
Hispanic Federation v. Byrd
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”