Civil Rights Groups Representing People Detained at the Broward Jail Ask Court to Enforce its Order Requiring Health and Safety Precautions against COVID-19
Despite the Continued Surge of COVID-19 Cases, the Jail has Failed to Improve Health Conditions for its Staff and the Thousands of Incarcerated People in its Custody as Mandated by a 2021 Consent Decree
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — The American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, the ACLU, Disability Rights Florida, and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP filed a motion asking a federal district court to enforce and modify a class-action consent decree requiring the Broward Sheriff’s Office (BSO) to improve COVID conditions for people currently detained in Broward County Jail.
The class of incarcerated people and BSO reached a settlement agreement in November 2020. In May 2021, a federal district court later approved it and ordered compliance with the agreement. The consent decree required BSO to improve conditions in the jail to protect over 3,400 incarcerated people from widespread infection. These measures include housing the medically vulnerable in a way that accommodates CDC-recommended social distancing, testing both incarcerated people and jail staff for COVID-19, quarantining those who either test positive for COVID-19 or come into contact with a positive case, and supplying incarcerated people with personal protective equipment.
Despite agreeing to the settlement in May 2021, BSO has not complied with many of its provisions and there is a growing outbreak of COVID-19 cases. Substantial evidence, including a medical expert’s report, sworn statements from people currently held at the jail, and BSO's own admissions, shows that BSO, among other things, failed to implement testing as recommended by the CDC, failed to provide adequate symptom screening for the medically vulnerable, failed to provide sufficient unbiased education on COVID prevention (including information on vaccination), and failed to provide adequate PPE to incarcerated people and staff alike.
“Broward County Jail has had sufficient time to fulfill the provisions they agreed to months ago,'' said Benjamin Stevenson of the ACLU of Florida. “Its failure to provide adequate health and safety measures has placed the lives of thousands of people in their custody at risk, most of whom are detained pretrial and have not been convicted of any offenses.”
In addition to asking the judge to ensure that BSO abides by the agreement, the settlement class also seeks to update the terms of the settlement to include provisions for vaccine distribution, to remedy the low levels of vaccination at the jail. Since the settlement was first proposed to the court, several vaccines were made available to the American public. In an effort to reach those hesitant about taking the vaccine and raise vaccination rates, the settlement class now asks that the court’s order include requirements that the jail regularly undertake active vaccination drives, and also offer non-punitive incentives to encourage vaccination participation.
“The Broward County Jail is not a safe place for the people who are forced to live there, especially without access to proper PPE or vaccines,” said Nancy Rosenbloom, a senior lawyer with the ACLU National Prison Project. “Jail leadership needs to step up and take urgent and badly needed steps to protect people locked up in crowded conditions in the jail from this deadly pandemic.”
The incarcerated population is increasingly at risk for death and serious injury because of COVID-19. Infection numbers continue to skyrocket in facilities all over the country, including at the jail. On July 18, 2021, BSO reported only one positive case of COVID-19 in the jail. On Aug. 18, one month later, BSO reported 36 positive cases. By Sept. 15 the number had grown to 180 positive cases (likely an undercount because of insufficient testing). Both detained people and staff are falling very ill, and some have died from the virus.
“The Broward County Jail continues to expose individuals with disabilities and medically vulnerable individuals to an unreasonable risk of contracting COVID-19,” said Curtis Filaroski, a senior staff attorney with Disability Rights Florida. “These individuals are particularly vulnerable to this virus, and we are concerned that even more people will die in the jail due to the Jail’s inadequate response to the most recent Delta variant outbreak. Serious action needs to be taken to comply with the provisions of the Consent Decree and protect these vulnerable populations.”
A copy of the motion can be viewed here:
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
Press ReleaseDec 2024
Prisoners' Rights
Criminal Law Reform
ACLU Sues Bureau of Prisons for Keeping People in Prison Longer Than the Law AllowsACLU Sues Bureau of Prisons for Keeping People in Prison Longer Than the Law Allows
WASHINGTON – A federal lawsuit brought today by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of D.C., and Jenner & Block LLP challenges the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) for unlawfully incarcerating people longer than the law allows under the First Step Act. The lawsuit contends that the BOP’s failure to implement the First Step Act according to its plain language violates the rights of thousands of people who should be returning to their communities and rebuilding their lives but instead remain incarcerated. Signed into law in 2018 by then-President Donald Trump, the bipartisan First Step Act was designed to reduce the population in federal prisons, reform extreme sentencing laws, and provide programming and reentry transition services to people in prison. Central to the First Step Act is a system of earned time credits, which allows people in prison to earn time off their sentences and time out of prison by participating in rehabilitation programs. Through the First Step Act, Congress unambiguously ordered BOP to move people out of prison when they meet certain requirements to use their earned time credits. Instead of faithfully following the mandatory law, BOP adopted a regulation treating the law as optional. As a result, thousands of people, who should already be back in their communities and with their families, remain in prison. “Every extra unlawful day our clients spend in prison is a serious injustice,” said Emma Andersson, deputy director of the Criminal Law Reform Project at the ACLU. “It is egregious that the Bureau of Prisons is imprisoning people for months longer than the law allows. The government must follow through on its legal obligation to get people out of prison on time and back into their communities, where they belong.” Additional comments below from: Vanessa Crowe, plaintiff: “Time is what I owed for my wrongdoing, and I have paid my time. But I should not have to spend more time in prison than the law allows. I often reflect on what I will miss during the months after when I should be out of prison. I will miss work and lose out on wages that would help me get back on my feet. I could be a tax paying citizen instead of a burden on society. But most of all, I will miss more precious time with my family. My family and I are ready to tum the page on this period in our lives — we are all ready to start a new life, a life with purpose, hope, and healing together. I want to start that life when I am legally entitled to start it-not five months later.” Arthur Spitzer, senior counsel at ACLU of D.C.: “There’s no excuse for the Bureau of Prisons to pretend not to understand Congress’s clear command that people who have earned the right to early release must be released. This law has been on the books for six years. The Bureau of Prisons has had plenty of time to understand it. Law enforcers should obey the law.” Betsy Henthorne, partner at Jenner & Block: “It has been six years since the First Step Act was signed, but despite Congress’s clear directives, the Bureau of Prisons continues to hold thousands of people in prison longer than the law allows. We should and do expect better—it’s past time for the BOP to ensure that those who have earned their release are able to return home to their families and communities according to the law Congress passed.” -
Press ReleaseSep 2024
National Security
Prisoners' Rights
ACLU Statement on Senator’s Discriminatory Questioning of Civil Rights Leader Maya BerryACLU Statement on Senator’s Discriminatory Questioning of Civil Rights Leader Maya Berry
WASHINGTON — American Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Anthony D. Romero, released the following statement regarding Sen. John Kennedy’s questioning of Maya Berry, the executive director of the Arab American Institute: “The American Civil Liberties Union condemns this discriminatory and vitriolic attack on Maya Berry, a renowned civil rights leader, and joins the chorus of voices from across the political spectrum in denouncing these remarks. “To use a hearing about the disturbing rise in anti-Muslim, anti-Arab, and antisemitic hate crimes to launch personal and discriminatory attacks on an expert witness they’ve invited to testify is both outrageous and inappropriate. This kind of racist rhetoric should be widely condemned. It has no place in Congress, or in politics. “Maya Berry is a courageous and compassionate leader who has spent her entire career working to strengthen our democracy and protect the rights of Arab American communities, and other vulnerable communities who face discrimination and targeting because of their ethnicity, race, or religion.” -
Ohio Supreme CourtSep 2024
Prisoners' Rights
State v. MorrisState v. Morris
This case in the Ohio Supreme Court concerns the scope of the state constitutional right to counsel. The police in this case interrogated the defendant, Isaiah Morris, without mentioning his already-appointed counsel or asking him to waive his right to counsel. This procedural circumstance risks confusing criminal defendants and undermining their state constitutional rights. The ACLU’s State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the ACLU of Ohio and WilmerHale, filed an amicus brief arguing that merely providing a defendant notice of Miranda rights falls short of the bare minimum requirements for a valid waiver. -
Oregon Supreme CourtSep 2024
Prisoners' Rights
Huskey v. Oregon Department of CorrectionsHuskey v. Oregon Department of Corrections
This case in the Oregon Supreme Court centers on whether Article I, Section 41(3) of the Oregon Constitution, which provides that Oregon prisoners lack legally enforceable rights to prison jobs and training, bars prisoners from collecting damages relating to lost prison jobs and training caused by the alleged breach of a settlement agreement by prison officials. The ACLU’s State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the ACLU of Oregon, filed an amicus brief arguing that that plaintiff Arnold Huskey, an incarcerated individual whose identity was used in Department of Corrections training materials, is entitled to damages notwithstanding Article I, Section 41(3), because plaintiffs in contract disputes never have to show standalone legal rights to the damages they claim. Instead, they need only show that the damages were reasonably foreseeable consequences of the alleged breach of contract.