Coca v. City of Dodge City
What's at Stake
Dodge City's (Kansas) at-large method of election for its city commission violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (“VRA”) by diluting the political power of the city’s Latine community. The at-large method of election also violates the Fourteenth Amendment because it is operated with a discriminatory purpose.
Summary
The American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Kansas, UCLA Voting Rights Project, and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP filed a lawsuit challenging the at-large method of election for the city commission for Dodge City, Kansas, as violative of Section 2 of the VRA and the Fourteenth Amendment.
The lawsuit is filed on behalf of two Latine residents of Dodge City. Even though Latines comprise 64% of the city’s total population, 59% of the city’s voting-age population, and 46% of the city’s citizen voting-age population, just two Latines have been elected to the five-member Dodge City Commission in the past three decades.
The Supreme Court has long recognized that at-large election systems like the one used in Dodge City can dilute the political power of voters of color. The court largely denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denied in full Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, allowing the case to proceed to trial. Trial was heard in February 2024.
Update: In July 2024, the district court issued a ruling rejecting the argument that Dodge City's at-large method of elections dilutes Latine voters' opportunity to elect a candidate of their choice.
Legal Documents
-
07/10/2024
Court's Memorandum and Order -
03/22/2024
Plaintiffs' Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law -
03/03/2024
Defendants' Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law -
02/20/2024
Plaintiffs Pre-Trial Brief -
02/20/2024
Defendants' Pre-Trial Brief -
12/13/2023
Order Denying Summary Judgment -
10/27/2023
Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment -
10/13/2023
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment -
09/22/2023
Defendants' Summary Judgment Brief -
04/18/2023
Order Denying Motion to Dismiss -
02/28/2023
Plaintiffs Reply in Support of United States' Statement of Interest -
02/27/2023
Defendants' Response to United States' Statement of Interest -
02/15/2023
Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss -
02/10/2023
Statement of Interest of the United States -
02/01/2023
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss -
01/11/2023
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint -
01/03/2023
Amended Complaint
Date Filed: 07/10/2024
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 03/22/2024
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 03/03/2024
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 02/20/2024
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 02/20/2024
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 12/13/2023
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 10/27/2023
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 10/13/2023
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 09/22/2023
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 04/18/2023
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 02/28/2023
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 02/27/2023
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 02/15/2023
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 02/10/2023
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 02/01/2023
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 01/11/2023
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Date Filed: 01/03/2023
Court: District Court (D. Kan.)
Affiliate: Kansas
Press Releases
ACLU of Kansas: Federal Court Allows Dodge City At-large Lawsuit to Move Forward to Trial
Voting Rights Advocates Challenge At-Large Election Method in Dodge City, Kansas