Minnesota\u2019s Medical Assistance program provides coverage for medically necessary care for virtually every type of medical condition. But for gender dysphoria, Minnesota law mandates a sweeping and categorical exclusion of all transition-related surgical care without any regard to whether the treatment is medically necessary for an individual recipient. As a result of this sweeping exclusion, most surgical treatments for gender dysphoria are excluded from coverage even though the same or substantially equivalent treatments are required to be covered under the federal Medicare program and private insurance plans regulated by the State of Minnesota.<\/p>\n
The complaint was filed on behalf of plaintiffs Evan Thomas and OutFront Minnesota, the state\u2019s leading LGBTQ rights group, arguing that this ban is discriminatory and has no basis in medical science.
Evan Thomas is currently on Medical Assistance and has been diagnosed with gender dysphoria. After fighting depression all his life, he began hormone therapy and legally changed his name and gender earlier this year. But he has been denied coverage for medically necessary transition-related surgery.
\u201cA weight was lifted when I first began my gender transition and realized I didn\u2019t have to pretend to be a woman anymore,\u201d said Evan Thomas. \u201cBeing denied surgical treatment is harmful to my health and well-being every day I\u2019m forced to live in this body.\u201d
OutFront is Minnesota\u2019s largest LGBTQ rights organization and is regularly contacted by transgender individuals on Medical Assistance or MinnesotaCare seeking coverage for transition services, including transition-related surgery. OutFront provides guidance to these individuals regarding Minnesota\u2019s Medical Assistance program and their coverage options.<\/p>\n
Ten states and the District of Columbia currently cover transition-related surgical care through their public health insurance programs. Transition-related surgery is also covered by Medicare.<\/p>\n
The case is filed against the Commissioner of Minnesota\u2019s Department of Human Services, and demands that Minnesota end its discriminatory practice of excluding transgender individuals from accessing all of their needed health care.<\/p>\n
Cooperating attorneys in the case include: Kristina Carlson, David Couillard, and JoLynn Markison of Dorsey & Whitney; Teresa Nelson of the ACLU-MN and Joshua Block of ACLU.<\/p>\nUpdate:<\/strong> Victory! On November 14, 2016, the U.S. District Court of Minnesota ruled in favor of Evan Thomas and OutFront Minnesota. The court held that the state ban on all trantision-related surgical care under Minnesota's Medical Assistance program violates the State Constitution. \n <\/p>\n","case_decision":"","featured_case":false,"legal_project":false,"date_filed":null,"administration_challenged":false,"constitutional_principle":[],"drupal_node_id":"55527","legal_documents":[{"court":1869,"documents":[{"document_options":"document","document":57949,"title":"OutFront Minnesota v. Johnson Piper - Order","subtitle":"","date_filed":"November 14, 2016 10:45 am","drupal_node_id":"59321","slug":"outfront-minnesota-v-johnson-piper-order","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":57950,"title":"OutFront Minnesota v. Johnson Piper - Answer ","subtitle":"","date_filed":"January 20, 2016 10:45 am","drupal_node_id":"59322","slug":"outfront-minnesota-v-johnson-piper-answer","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":57951,"title":"OutFront Minnesota v. Johnson Piper - Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"December 17, 2015 12:30 pm","drupal_node_id":"55528","slug":"outfront-minnesota-v-johnson-piper-complaint","child_documents":null}]}],"plaintiffs":null,"co-counsel":null,"press_releases_related_to_cases":[84573],"related_content_cases":[6215],"related_content_documents":null,"related_content_publications":null},"yoast_head":"\n