{"id":190117,"date":"2024-10-03T16:28:18","date_gmt":"2024-10-03T20:28:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/?post_type=case&p=190117"},"modified":"2024-10-03T16:28:18","modified_gmt":"2024-10-03T20:28:18","slug":"quinn-v-raffensperger","status":"publish","type":"case","link":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/quinn-v-raffensperger","title":{"rendered":"Quinn v. Raffensperger"},"menu_order":0,"template":"","supreme_court_term":[],"court":[],"class_list":["post-190117","case","type-case","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":{"case_number":"24-cv-04364","featured_image":53223,"issues":[46799,46459,46463],"court_type":"other","case_type":false,"supreme_court_term":null,"state_territory_affiliate":[344],"status":"ongoing","date_updated":"20241003","whats_at_stake":"The ACLU, along with several partner organizations, have sought to intervene in this case to represent the rights of voters and voting-rights organizations in a case that asks a federal court to compel the state to conduct list maintenance and move voters to the inactive list on the eve of a presidential election. The relief that the private plaintiffs seek is presumptively unlawful because this list maintenance activity would happen within 90 days of a federal election, in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (\u201cNVRA\u201d).","call_to_action":null,"summary":"On September 26, two Georgians filed a lawsuit alleging that the State has failed to conduct voter-list maintenance as required by the NVRA and by governing Georgia law. They make their claims based on unknown database matching that they undertook with an outdated voter file. They ask the court to order the state to send notices to all voters identified by their database matching and to move any voter who does not respond to the notice to the inactive list prior to the November 2024 election.\r\n\r\nRepresenting the Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, the Georgia Coalition for the People\u2019s Agenda, Inc., and the League of Women Voters of Georgia, the ACLU, along with ACLU of Georgia, Lawyers\u2019 Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and Legal Defense Fund, has sought to intervene in the case. We ask the court to reject the plaintiffs the relief seek, which would be unprecedented and in clear violation of federal law\u2014made more troubling in the eve of the November 2024 election.","case_decision":"","featured_case":false,"legal_project":"","date_filed":null,"administration_challenged":"","constitutional_principle":[],"drupal_node_id":"","legal_documents":[{"court":1973,"documents":[{"document_options":"document","document":190132,"title":"Proposed Intervenor-Defendants Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Georgia Coalition for the Peoples' Agenda, Inc., and League of Women Voters of Georgia Proposed Motion to Dismiss","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20241002","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":190125,"title":"Brief in Support of Motion to Intervene by Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda, Inc., and League of Women Voters of Georgia","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20241002","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":190123,"title":"Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20240926","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null}]}],"plaintiffs":"","co-counsel":"","press_releases_related_to_cases":"","related_content_cases":"","related_content_documents":"","related_content_publications":""},"yoast_head":"\nQuinn v. Raffensperger | American Civil Liberties Union<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The ACLU, along with several partner organizations, have sought to intervene in this case to represent the rights of voters and voting-rights organizations in a case that asks a federal court to compel the state to conduct list maintenance and move voters to the inactive list on the eve of a presidential election. The relief that the private plaintiffs seek is presumptively unlawful because this list maintenance activity would happen within 90 days of a federal election, in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (\u201cNVRA\u201d).\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/quinn-v-raffensperger\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Quinn v. Raffensperger | American Civil Liberties Union\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The ACLU, along with several partner organizations, have sought to intervene in this case to represent the rights of voters and voting-rights organizations in a case that asks a federal court to compel the state to conduct list maintenance and move voters to the inactive list on the eve of a presidential election. The relief that the private plaintiffs seek is presumptively unlawful because this list maintenance activity would happen within 90 days of a federal election, in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (\u201cNVRA\u201d).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/quinn-v-raffensperger\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Civil Liberties Union\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@aclu\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/quinn-v-raffensperger\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/quinn-v-raffensperger\",\"name\":\"Quinn v. Raffensperger | American Civil Liberties Union\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-03T20:28:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-03T20:28:18+00:00\",\"description\":\"The ACLU, along with several partner organizations, have sought to intervene in this case to represent the rights of voters and voting-rights organizations in a case that asks a federal court to compel the state to conduct list maintenance and move voters to the inactive list on the eve of a presidential election. The relief that the private plaintiffs seek is presumptively unlawful because this list maintenance activity would happen within 90 days of a federal election, in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (\u201cNVRA\u201d).\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/quinn-v-raffensperger\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/\",\"name\":\"American Civil Liberties Union\",\"description\":\"The ACLU dares to create a more perfect union \u2014 beyond one person, party, or side. Our mission is to realize this promise of the United States Constitution for all and expand the reach of its guarantees.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Quinn v. Raffensperger | American Civil Liberties Union","description":"The ACLU, along with several partner organizations, have sought to intervene in this case to represent the rights of voters and voting-rights organizations in a case that asks a federal court to compel the state to conduct list maintenance and move voters to the inactive list on the eve of a presidential election. The relief that the private plaintiffs seek is presumptively unlawful because this list maintenance activity would happen within 90 days of a federal election, in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (\u201cNVRA\u201d).","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/quinn-v-raffensperger","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Quinn v. Raffensperger | American Civil Liberties Union","og_description":"The ACLU, along with several partner organizations, have sought to intervene in this case to represent the rights of voters and voting-rights organizations in a case that asks a federal court to compel the state to conduct list maintenance and move voters to the inactive list on the eve of a presidential election. The relief that the private plaintiffs seek is presumptively unlawful because this list maintenance activity would happen within 90 days of a federal election, in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (\u201cNVRA\u201d).","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/quinn-v-raffensperger","og_site_name":"American Civil Liberties Union","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@aclu","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/quinn-v-raffensperger","url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/quinn-v-raffensperger","name":"Quinn v. Raffensperger | American Civil Liberties Union","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-10-03T20:28:18+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-03T20:28:18+00:00","description":"The ACLU, along with several partner organizations, have sought to intervene in this case to represent the rights of voters and voting-rights organizations in a case that asks a federal court to compel the state to conduct list maintenance and move voters to the inactive list on the eve of a presidential election. The relief that the private plaintiffs seek is presumptively unlawful because this list maintenance activity would happen within 90 days of a federal election, in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (\u201cNVRA\u201d).","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/quinn-v-raffensperger"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/","name":"American Civil Liberties Union","description":"The ACLU dares to create a more perfect union \u2014 beyond one person, party, or side. Our mission is to realize this promise of the United States Constitution for all and expand the reach of its guarantees.","inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/190117"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/case"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/190117\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":190133,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/190117\/revisions\/190133"}],"acf:post":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affiliate_info\/344"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue\/46463"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue\/46459"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue\/46799"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=190117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"supreme_court_term","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/supreme_court_term?post=190117"},{"taxonomy":"court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/court?post=190117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}