吃瓜大本营

ATLANTA 鈥� Voting rights organizations filed an emergency preliminary injunction motion today to lift part of the restriction in Georgia鈥檚 anti-voter law, S.B. 202, that blocks Georgians from providing food and water to voters waiting in long lines at the polls.

The motion was filed as part of ongoing litigation in AME Church v. Kemp, which challenges S.B. 202 for unconstitutionally creating barriers to voting that diminish the voices of communities of color, women, and people with disabilities. If granted, the preliminary injunction would allow volunteers to provide food and water to voters in lines that extend beyond 150 feet from the polling place.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), ACLU of Georgia, Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Legal Defense Fund (LDF), and the law firms WilmerHale and Davis Wright Tremaine LLP (DWT) filed the motion on behalf of the plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs are the Sixth District of the American Methodist Episcopal Church, Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Georgia ADAPT, and the Georgia Advocacy Office, represented by the ACLU of Georgia, ACLU, LDF, and Wilmer Hale, as well as the Georgia Muslim Voter Project, Women Watch Afrika, Latino Community Fund of Georgia, and the Arc of the United States, represented by SPLC and DWT.

鈥淥ur clients used to be able to offer a bottle of water or a snack to voters waiting in long lines at the polls,鈥� said Rahul Garabadu, senior voting rights staff attorney at the ACLU of Georgia. 鈥淪.B. 202 largely banned these activities, adding to the burdens that many voters, including voters of color and voters with disabilities, face when casting a ballot. Last year, the court found that there were serious constitutional concerns with portions of the ban on line relief. We鈥檙e now asking the court to strike down the unlawful provisions of the ban so that our clients can provide crucial support to voters across our state.鈥�

鈥淭his restriction on providing food and water to voters waiting in long lines is a brazen attempt to make voting more difficult in Georgia. It stifles our clients鈥� First Amendment right to express, through action, the important message that voting is vital, and that Georgians, particularly Black Georgians and Georgians of color, should persist through obstacles laid in their path as they have throughout the state鈥檚 history,鈥� said Davin Rosborough, senior staff attorney with the ACLU鈥檚 Voting Rights Project.

鈥淭he cruel barriers to voting enacted by S.B. 202 target both the basic needs and basic rights of Georgians. There can be no reason for denying food or water to people waiting in long polling lines, other than trying to prevent them from exercising their freedom to vote,鈥� said Poy Winichakul, SPLC鈥檚 senior staff attorney for voting rights. 鈥淭hese barriers to voting must be removed so all Georgians can have a voice to advocate for their communities in the crucial 2024 elections.鈥�

鈥淪.B. 202鈥檚 provisions restricting line relief activities are cruel and discriminatory,鈥� said Rhonda Briggins, chair, Strategic Partnerships Taskforce for Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. 鈥淭hese restrictions prevent Deltas from providing necessities like food and water to voters experiencing long lines, which impact significant numbers of Black Georgia voters. We are hopeful the court will block the unlawful restrictions it has already recognized may be unlawful so that we can resume some of our line relief efforts for upcoming elections.鈥�

鈥淕eorgia鈥檚 cruel line relief ban makes it harder for Black voters to fully participate in elections,鈥� said John Cusick, assistant counsel at LDF. 鈥淭he court has already found constitutional concerns with certain aspects of the line relief ban. We鈥檙e asking the court to block those provisions in upcoming elections so that the organizations we represent and other groups throughout Georgia can resume modest line relief efforts like passing out food and water to Georgia voters who continue to stand in unacceptably long lines.鈥�

鈥淪.B. 202鈥檚 line relief ban imposes unjustifiable and unconstitutional burdens on voters at the polls,鈥� said George P. Varghese, a partner at WilmerHale. 鈥淲e are filing this motion to ensure that our clients鈥� fundamental right to vote, and their right to support fellow Georgians who vote, are not compromised 鈥� including in the upcoming 2024 elections.鈥�

鈥淚nstead of making it easier for folks to cast a ballot in sweltering heat or blistering cold, S.B. 202 makes it a crime for a neighbor to offer these voters a bottle of water or warm cup of coffee,鈥� said Adam S. Sieff, counsel at Davis Wright Tremaine. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 not only inhumane, it鈥檚 also a clear violation of the First Amendment and these citizens鈥� rights as voters. The court has already found that aspects of S.B. 202鈥檚 line relief ban raises serious constitutional problems, and we鈥檙e filing this motion to ensure that these fundamental rights are respected in future elections, including in 2024.鈥�

Filing: /documents/ame-church-v-kemp-pi-motion-on-georgia-line-relief-4-24-2023

Case background: /cases/sixth-district-african-methodist-episcopal-church-v-kemp