Voting Rights Advocates Warn That Ohio Secretary LaRose’s Mass Removal of Voters May Violate Federal Law
COLUMBUS, Ohio — The American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Ohio, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law, League of Women Voters of Ohio, and Common Cause Ohio today sent a letter to Secretary Frank LaRose regarding improper removals of voters from the rolls.
These removals are based on mass challenges to voter eligibility by third parties who have no personal knowledge about the voters, and are using unreliable data. Some voters were removed in August based on purported changes of address and their removals were not preceded by the notice-and-waiting period required by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), and others were flagged for potential future removal.
The organizations’ letter emphasizes that systematically removing voters during the 90 days prior to a general election for federal office would also violate the NVRA. The letter specifically cites Delaware and Muskingum counties as having violated federal law, but identifies potential violations in other counties, including Logan.
“As Ohio’s chief election officer, Secretary LaRose must ensure compliance with the National Voter Registration Act. It is his duty and responsibility to be fully acquainted with federal election law, and we urge him to refrain from unlawful removals, and correct all violations in an expedient manner,” said Freda Levenson, legal director for the ACLU of Ohio.
“Secretary LaRose has a duty and an obligation to protect eligible Ohio voters on the rolls by following federal law,” said Sarah Brannon, deputy director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project.
“The League of Voters helped support the passage of the National Voter Registration Act, which requires transparent, accurate, and fair maintenance of the voter rolls in each state,” said Jen Miller, executive director of the League of Women Voters of Ohio. “We call on Secretary LaRose to ensure that elections officials have all the support and information they need to make Ohio a great place to vote, which starts with compliance with federal law.”
“Despite the absence of statewide guidance, local officials must protect eligible voters on the rolls by following federal law. This close to an election, improper removals can sow needless confusion and doubt among voters about their eligibility and about Ohio's elections, which are safe and secure. These purges are putting voters’ rights at risk,” said Alice Clapman, senior counsel in the Brennan Center's democracy program.
“This close to an election, officials must be extra vigilant to make sure no voters are improperly removed from the rolls. After all, our vote is our voice, and it deserves to be heard on Election Day. Let’s make sure every eligible voter is able to cast a ballot this November,” said Catherine Turcer, executive director of Common Cause Ohio.
The organizations request the secretary to correct the violations within 20 days or they may seek legal recourse. The Department of Justice issued last month reaffirming the rules for maintaining voter rolls in compliance with federal law.
A copy of the letter is .
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”