Voting Rights Advocates Celebrate Legislative Change in Mississippi Following Voter Challenge Lawsuit
JACKSON, Miss. — Voting rights advocates celebrate a significant victory as the Mississippi Legislature rolled back an unlawful restriction placed on voters.
This legislative change, which takes effect July 1, follows a successful lawsuit led by Disability Rights Mississippi, the League of Women Voters of Mississippi, and three individual Mississippi voters.
In August 2023, a preliminary injunction was secured to block S.B. 2358, a 2023 state law severely restricting Mississippi voters’ right to receive assistance with delivering or returning their ballot.
As a direct result of this injunction, Mississippi enacted S.B. 2425 in 2024 to correct the flaws identified by the federal district court. Under the amended law, voters who need assistance due to disability, blindness, or inability to read or write can choose a person to help them with delivering or returning their absentee mail-in ballot. There are five specific exceptions: Voters cannot receive assistance from their employer, union representative, a candidate on the ballot, a candidate’s family member, or a poll watcher.
Voters without a disability or inability to read or write may receive assistance from a family member (anyone related by blood, marriage, adoption, or legal guardianship), household member (anyone who resides at the same residence), or caregiver (anyone who provides medical, health care assistance, or other assistance to the voter at a residence, institution, or facility).
The lawsuit leading to this change was filed on behalf of and the by the,, American Civil Liberties Union, and
Quotes from key advocates:
Mamie Cunningham, grassroots organizer/community activist, director of Patterson Community Organization, and a Black Voters Matter partner in Northeast Mississippi: “Many people with disabilities in rural communities would not vote if they did not have assistance. In Mississippi, voting by absentee ballot is an overwhelming process even for people without disabilities. The process is complicated and calls for several actions before it’s accepted by the circuit clerk to be processed.”
Ming Cheung, staff attorney with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project: “Mississippi never should have restricted voters from receiving the assistance they need, and it took a federal injunction for the state to change course. The Mississippi Legislature should enact measures to expand voter access in the state, which remains one of the most difficult places to vote in the country.”
Joshua Tom, legal director at the ACLU of Mississippi: “Voting is one of our fundamental rights as Americans. Instead of ensuring every eligible person can cast a ballot, Mississippi made it harder for certain people with disabilities to vote. We sued and won. We will continue to protect Mississippians’ voting rights.”
Peg Ciraldo, co-president of the League of Women Voters of Mississippi: “Voting is basic and necessary to a democracy. The League of Women Voters of Mississippi is proud to be part of this legal and legislative victory. The League will continue our mission to empower voters and defend democracy by protecting equal access to the ballot for all.”
Caren Short, director of legal and research at the League of Women Voters of the US: “Across the country, anti-voter state legislatures are attempting to make it harder for voters with disabilities to vote by limiting who can assist with absentee ballots. The League has fought to ensure Mississippi voters who require assistance can exercise their right to receive the assistance they need. With this new legislation, League members in Mississippi will not be prosecuted for carrying out our mission to empower voters.”
Ahmed Soussi, senior staff attorney with the SPLC’s Voting Rights Practice Group: “This victory is because of our plaintiffs' amazing work to ensure voters with disabilities can enforce their full voting rights. We will continue to protect their rights and ensure Mississippi complies with the Voting Rights Act.”
Rob McDuff, director of the Impact Litigation Initiative at the Mississippi Center for Justice: “In Mississippi, we need to promote opportunities to vote, not limit them. Our lawsuit promotes those opportunities, and we celebrate the outcome.”
Greta Kemp Martin, litigation director of Disability Rights Mississippi: “This legislative change is a monumental step forward for voting rights in Mississippi, ensuring that every citizen’s voice is heard and respected. This victory is a testament to the power of advocacy and the relentless pursuit of voting equality for all.”
Voting Rights
Disability Rights Mississippi v. Fitch
Voting Rights
Disability Rights Mississippi v. Fitch
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”