吃瓜大本营

WASHINGTON 鈥� In a historic win for voting rights, the U.S. Supreme Court today ruled in Allen v. Milligan in favor of Black voters who challenged Alabama鈥檚 2021-enacted congressional map for violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 for diluting Black political power, affirming the district court鈥檚 order that Alabama redraw its congressional map.

By packing and cracking the historic Black Belt community, the map passed by the state legislature allowed Black voters an opportunity to elect candidates of their choice in only one of seven districts even though they make up 27 percent of the voting-age population. In its decision, the court also affirmed that under Section 2 of the VRA, race can be used in the redistricting process to provide equal opportunities to communities of color and ensure they are not packed and cracked in a way that impermissibly weakens their voting strength.

The case was brought in November 2021 on behalf of Evan Milligan, Khadidah Stone, Letetia Jackson, Shalela Dowdy, Greater Birmingham Ministries, and the Alabama State Conference of the NAACP who are represented by the Legal Defense Fund (LDF), American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Alabama, Hogan Lovells LLP, and Wiggins, Childs, Pantazis, Fisher & Goldfarb. It was argued before the court on Oct. 4, 2022.

The court鈥檚 decision today is a historic win in the fight for voting rights in the face of countless continued attacks on democracy. In its decision reaffirming the legal test for evaluating claims under the VRA first adopted in the 1980s, the U.S. Supreme Court cited the overwhelming evidence of discrimination presented by the plaintiffs in the district court.

Since the U.S. Supreme Court gutted preclearance in Shelby County v. Holder, this redistricting cycle was the first without federal oversight, allowing hostile state governments to pass maps that dilute the voices of Black voters and other voters of color. This decision is a clear message to lawmakers that their responsibility has not changed: They must ensure that voters of color are not denied an opportunity to participate in the electoral process.

鈥淭his decision is a crucial win against the continued onslaught of attacks on voting rights,鈥� said LDF senior counsel Deuel Ross, who argued the case before the court in October. 鈥淎labama attempted to rewrite federal law by saying race had no place in redistricting. But because of the state鈥檚 sordid and well-documented history of racial discrimination, race must be used to remedy that past and ensure communities of color are not boxed out of the electoral process. While the Voting Rights Act and other key protections against discriminatory voting laws have been weakened in recent years and states continue to pass provisions to disenfranchise Black voters, today鈥檚 decision is a recognition of Section 2鈥檚 purpose to prevent voting discrimination and the very basic right to a fair shot.鈥�

Davin Rosborough, senior staff attorney with the ACLU鈥檚 Voting Rights Project, said, 鈥淭he Supreme Court rejected the Orwellian idea that it鈥檚 inappropriate to consider race in determining whether racial discrimination led to the creation of illegal maps. This ruling is a huge victory for Black Alabamians.鈥�

Plaintiffs from the case released the following joint comment: 鈥淚n 2021, Alabama lawmakers targeted Black voters by packing and cracking us so we could not have a meaningful impact on the electoral process. They attempted to redefine Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and shirk their responsibility to ensure communities of color are given an equal opportunity to elect their preferred candidates. Today, the Supreme Court reminded them of that responsibility by ordering a new map be drawn that complies with federal law 鈥� one that recognizes the diversity in our state rather than erasing it. This fight was won through generations of Black leaders who refused to be silent, and while much work is left, today we can move forward with these reaffirmed protections civil rights leaders fought and died for.鈥�

鈥淭he key takeaway from today鈥檚 decision is the court鈥檚 acknowledgment that the Alabama Legislature knowingly continued its legacy of drawing illegal voting districts that disenfranchise Black voters. The Alabama Legislature must now draw new, fairer voting districts,鈥� said Tish Gotell Faulks, the ACLU of Alabama鈥檚 legal director. 鈥淭hough we were victorious today, history shows us that lawmakers will erect many more hurdles before every Alabamian, irrespective of their race, can vote for representatives that reflect their beliefs, values, and priorities. Efforts remain underway from Montgomery to Jackson to Baton Rouge, and elsewhere across the country to minimize, marginalize, and eliminate the ability of Black and brown people to have a voice in their communities. Our communities then 鈥� as now 鈥� understand that the fight to uphold our civil rights is a daily pursuit. We will persist.鈥�

Ruling:

This case is part of the ACLU鈥檚 Joan and Irwin Jacobs Supreme Court Docket.