Members of Congress Join Rights Groups in Urging White House to Study Creating National Human Rights Institution
Second Summit for Democracy Provides Venue for Promoting Human Rights at Home, Groups Say
WASHINGTON — Nine members of Congress are joining a broad coalition of civil and human rights groups led by the American Civil Liberties Union in urging the Biden administration to establish a presidential commission to study the creation of a National Human Rights Institution (NHRI) in the United States to monitor and promote human rights.
In letters sent to President Biden ahead of the second Summit for Democracy, the members of Congress and the International Association of Official Human Rights Agencies (IAOHRA) stress the importance of a National Human Rights Institution to ensure the U.S. takes bold actions to strengthen American democracy by creating domestic human rights infrastructure that would help monitor and protect human rights at home. The ACLU also urging activists and supporters to add their name to a petition calling on President Biden to act.
“The best way for the United States to lead on human rights is by the power of example,” said Rep. James P. McGovern. “President Biden has said it himself: the commitment to human rights begins at home. By establishing a presidential commission to explore creating a National Human Rights Institution for the U.S., the President will be taking an important, concrete step toward ensuring that we live up to the standards we expect of other countries. The U.S. must walk the walk on human rights – not just talk the talk.”
Democracies around the world — including — have independent bodies dedicated to monitoring and promoting human rights. By establishing a NHRI, the U.S. would contribute to a widespread global practice of human rights compliance.
“While the U.S. has a long tradition of supporting human rights and democracy abroad, we have often failed to practice at home what we preach overseas and neglected to translate our own international commitments into domestic policy,” said Jamil Dakwar, director of the ACLU’s Human Rights Program. “For too long, we’ve been a shameful outlier. A National Human Rights Institution would bring some much-needed structure and help bring the U.S. in line with international human rights norms and full compliance with ratified treaties. The time for action is now.”
The letter highlights different potential models for a NHRI, with functions that could include:
- Promoting and monitoring the implementation of human rights obligations;
- Interfacing with international human rights institutions;
- Providing a public forum for the investigation of violations of human rights;
- Creating a platform for recommendations to improve human rights compliance;
- Establishing mechanisms to advise and inform legislative, judicial, and executive branches on human rights standards; and
- Supporting and providing guidance to state and local human rights commissions.
“The United States should be a role model for protecting human rights, and that work starts here at home,” said Rep. Katie Porter. “A National Human Rights Institution will help us lead the world in promoting civil liberties and championing government accountability. I hope President Biden will use this opportunity to reaffirm our global commitments and rebuild our country’s reputation as a strong voice for universal human rights.”
“We urge you to take the opportunity of the Summit to announce your support for the establishment of a presidential commission to explore the creation of an NHRI in the United States. In the long run, an NHRI would reinforce and champion the Summit’s ‘vision of our world that is grounded in democratic values: transparent, responsive, and accountable governance; rule of law; and respect for human rights,’” the congressional letter reads.
“As our member agencies work to protect the rights and dignity of all persons, they are looking to the federal government for leadership and support,” said Dr. Alisa Warren, president of the International Association of Official Human Rights Agencies. “An NHRI would allow for unprecedented progress towards domestic implementation of our international human rights commitments and would bring human rights home to the U.S. Because establishing a national human rights institution is a task that will take time and require the input of numerous government actors, it is vitally important to begin taking significant steps towards this goal.”
In December, a large coalition of 85 civil society groups, including the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, NAACP, National Network to End Domestic Violence, International Indian Treaty Council, Southern Poverty Law Center, and the American Jewish Committee, called on the Biden administration to take action on a national human rights institution.
“The U.S. has an important role to play in promoting human rights around the world, but it must hold itself to the same standards it seeks to promote abroad,” said Lisa Borden, senior policy counsel with the Southern Poverty Law Center and the SPLC Action Fund. “The lack of a national human rights institution is an area in which the U.S. lags behind its allies and peers and is an obstacle to the fulfillment of human rights at home.”
The letter from members of Congress was signed by Reps. James McGovern, Eleanor Norton, Ilhan Omar, Katie Porter, Ayanna Pressley, Jamie Raskin, Rashida Tlaib, Cori Bush, and Jill Tokuda.
The IAOHRA letter is here: /letter/iaohra-letter-need-national-human-rights-institution
The ACLU’s petition is here:
Further information on national human rights institutions may be found in this released last December by the UC Irvine School of Law International Justice Clinic.
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Human Rights
Failed War on Drugs Policies Won't Stop the Overdose Crisis, But Harm Reduction Can Save LivesFailed War on Drugs Policies Won't Stop the Overdose Crisis, But Harm Reduction Can Save Lives
Research shows extensive benefits from syringe exchange and other harm reduction programs. But misguided efforts to ban common sense care continue. -
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Racial Justice
Human Rights
Why the Fight for Racial Justice is a Human Rights IssueWhy the Fight for Racial Justice is a Human Rights Issue
On International Human Rights Day, the ACLU is advocating for a long-sought after reparatory justice to end the continued abuses against Black and brown communities. -
Press ReleaseOct 2024
Human Rights
Free Speech
Universities Should Protect Students’ Right to Protest, End Crackdown on Peaceful ProtestsUniversities Should Protect Students’ Right to Protest, End Crackdown on Peaceful Protests
WASHINGTON – College and university presidents across the U.S. need to respect and protect the right to protest in support of Palestinian rights the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch said today in an open letter. For months the organizations have raised concerns about the potential use of unlawful force when university administrators call in law enforcement officers to break up demonstrations on campus. This new letter comes after reports of heavy-handed and excessive force by some campus police and local law enforcement against peaceful protests and encampments across the country. The groups provide recommendations for colleges and universities to ensure they protect the right to protest on their campuses. The organizations also urge university administrations to refrain from taking any further measures to suppress student protests on campus, including stopping the use of so-called less lethal weapons and ensuring that coercive police power is used only as a last resort, among other recommendations. “Universities are responsible for protecting both physical safety and free expression on campus,” said Jamil Dakwar, director at the ACLU’s Human Rights Program. “It’s deeply concerning to see universities needlessly expose students to police violence for peacefully expressing their political opinions. We’re urging schools once again to exercise restraint, practice de-escalation, and protect free speech and dissent on campus.” Preliminary analysis by Amnesty International’s Digital Verification Corps has identified at least 174 photos, videos, or social media posts from 20 universities of potential excessive use of force by law enforcement under international law that merits further investigation. This includes 17 universities where chemical irritants such as pepper spray appear to have been used against student protesters, and 11 universities where officers appear to have responded to protests armed with kinetic impact projectiles such as rubber bullets. The results of this use of force by law enforcement agencies have been devastating, including media-verified reports of severe injuries such as bleeding puncture wounds, head injuries, broken teeth, and suspected broken bones, most notably at the University of California Los Angeles, Columbia University, and the City College of New York. The Digital Verification Corps also documented at least 10 other universities where photos or videos capture potential injuries to students. It found that half of the incidents involving injuries under investigation appear to be the result of chemical irritants. “The information we have gathered on excessive use of force against student protesters is extremely worrisome and we are still in the beginning of our investigation,” said Justin Mazzola, researcher with Amnesty International USA. “With the continuation of the Israeli military’s assault on Gaza and the risk of US complicity through the sending of weapons, campus protests in favor of stopping the violence and destruction will continue. Universities have a responsibility to protect academic freedom and the rights to freedom of expression, and to peacefully protest, and we will be watching to ensure they do.” The ACLU, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch are not alone in their concern. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, and several UN experts, including the UN special rapporteur on the right to education, have criticized the violent crackdown on peaceful demonstrators by law enforcement and disciplinary measures against students exercising their rights to peaceful assembly and freedom of expression. All higher education institutions, even private colleges and universities, where the First Amendment is not applicable, have a responsibility to respect the right to freedom of peaceful assembly under international law. “Instead of resorting to police action that both shuts down free speech and heightens the risk of injuries, universities need to do more to protect student speech from violence and intimidation, and actively ensure that peaceful student expression continues without interference,” said Tanya Greene, director of the US program at Human Rights Watch. As the letter explains, the ACLU, Amnesty International USA, and Human Rights Watch are conducting research and analysis of how campus administrators are responding to student protests. They urge universities to fulfill their human rights responsibilities by facilitating protests and ensuring that all students' rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, regardless of viewpoint, is respected. A comprehensive joint report on this issue is slated to be released by the ACLU and Amnesty International USA in the coming months. The open letter is available here: /documents/letter-to-universities-student-protesters -
News & CommentaryOct 2024
Immigrants' Rights
Human Rights
Three Ways the Media Introduces Bias to the Immigration DebateThree Ways the Media Introduces Bias to the Immigration Debate
Ahead of the election, we examined how political ads and news media stories depict the immigration debate as more negative than it may be.