Historic Hearing Challenging Racial Bias in North Carolina’s Death Penalty Concludes with Overwhelming Evidence of Discrimination in Capital Cases
North Carolina v. Hasson Bacote, the leading case filed under NC’s Racial Justice Act, could affect more than 100 people on death row
SMITHFIELD, N.C. — A historic Racial Justice Act hearing came to a close Friday after two weeks of testimony that illustrated the discrimination inherent in North Carolina’s death penalty. The evidence showed a clear and persistent pattern of racial bias in jury exclusions that denies people of color the opportunity to serve on capital juries and leads to a disproportionate number of extreme sentences for Black men, as well as a direct line between modern death sentences and the state’s history of racial terrorism.
“We have white prosecutors standing in front of overwhelmingly white juries comparing Black defendants facing the death penalty to animals — ‘mad dogs,’ ‘hyenas,’ ‘predators of the African plain,’” said Henderson Hill, senior counsel with the American Civil Liberties Union’s Capital Punishment Project. “The racism in North Carolina’s application of the death penalty is so clear it’s blinding.”
The hearing began Feb. 26, and centered on the , a Black man from Johnston County who was sentenced to death in 2009. Bacote argued that race played an impermissible role in jury selection — not just in his case, but in all death penalty cases in North Carolina. The lawsuit was filed in 2010 under North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act, and is likely to affect more than 100 people currently living on the state’s death row. Mr. Bacote is represented by the ACLU Capital Punishment Project, the Legal Defense Fund, the Center for Death Penalty Litigation, and attorney Jay Ferguson.
Bacote is one of eight Black men who have faced capital trials in Johnston County — all eight were sentenced to death. Nationally acclaimed public interest attorney Bryan Stevenson, who founded the Equal Justice Initiative and authored the book Just Mercy, took the stand to put Bacote’s case in context. Stevenson said the trial echoed trends he’s seen across the South, in which prosecutors strike Black jurors for reasons that are clearly a pretext for race. He cited several examples of pervasive discrimination in jury selection, including:
- Prosecutors struck Black jurors because of NAACP membership, connections to historically Black colleges, and living in majority-Black neighborhoods — and then claimed that those reasons were “race-neutral.”
- Prosecutors believed their strikes of Black jurors could not be racist because they had allowed other Black people to remain on the jury, as if the law ensured “a quota system and not a legitimate opportunity for every person.”
- Prosecutors in North Carolina, who are overwhelmingly white, questioned Black jurors with the presumption that they were dishonest or hostile to the state, asking them essentially to “prove to me that I can put you on the jury despite the fact that you’re Black.”
“Next to voting, serving on a jury is the most significant thing a citizen gets to do to participate in the democratic process,” Stevenson said. “It’s a big deal to contribute to democracy on a jury. And for a lot of people who have never had that opportunity, never had that chance, because of their race or their gender, it’s also a big deal when we continue to tolerate that exclusion.”
Tufts University social psychologist Sam Sommers took the stand to explain the concept of implicit bias, which drives people to discriminate even when they have no conscious intent. He said that strikes driven by “gut feelings” about jurors, as well as their body language and demeanor, can be heavily influenced by implicit bias.
Emory University historian Crystal Sanders testified to the full picture of racism in Johnston County, where her family has lived for generations and her ancestors were once enslaved. In addition to billboards promoting the Ku Klux Klan, which stood in several locations around Johnston County until the late 1970s, she cited many other examples of how Black people have been terrorized and disenfranchised in Johnston County, often at the hands of law enforcement and other leaders. Sanders detailed:
- Sustained Black voter suppression that has led to only a single Black person ever being elected to countywide office
- Housing segregation enforced by threats, violence and cross burnings documented into the 1980s and 1990s
- Public KKK rallies that happened as late as 2001
- Egregious wrongful convictions of Black teenagers, including 16-year-old in 1998, which caused a national outcry
- Police killings of restrained and subdued Black men that were never punished
- Openly racist statements made by the county sheriff in the local newspaper
University of North Carolina historian Seth Kotch testified about continuing lynching threats made against people facing the death penalty — threats that often came from people in the jury pool. He said modern capital trials reveal “the endurance of the idea that certain defendants deserve death rather than due process.”
This evidence was supported by several experts who provided statistical analyses showing that prosecutors across North Carolina used peremptory strikes to exclude qualified Black citizens from capital juries at more than twice the rate of white citizens. And in Johnston County, prosecutors struck qualified Black citizens from juries at three times the rate of whites.
In cases prosecuted by Greg Butler, who sent Bacote and several other men to death row, Black citizens were 10 times as likely to be struck. Butler used the racially coded term “thug” to describe Bacote to the jury.
During his testimony, Butler refused to acknowledge that racial bias, whether conscious or implicit, could have been a factor.
“I hope our state’s leaders will look at this incredible body of evidence and see it as a call to action,” said Gretchen Engel, executive director of the Center for Death Penalty Litigation. “So far, we’ve mostly seen our state’s prosecutors attempt to bury the evidence. Now, it’s time for us to come together, confront the facts head on, and figure out how we’re going to root out the deeply embedded racism in our courtrooms.”
More on North Carolina v. Hasson Bacote:
Capital Punishment
North Carolina Racial Justice Act Litigation (North Carolina v. Hasson Bacote)
Capital Punishment
North Carolina Racial Justice Act Litigation (North Carolina v. Hasson Bacote)
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
PodcastDec 2024
Capital Punishment
Can Commuting the Row Be Biden's Real Legacy? Herman Lindsey and Cassy Stubbs Discuss With W. Kamau BellCan Commuting the Row Be Biden's Real Legacy? Herman Lindsey and Cassy Stubbs Discuss With W. Kamau Bell
-
Press ReleaseDec 2024
Capital Punishment
Over 130 Civil and Human Rights Organizations Call on President Biden to Commute Federal Death SentencesOver 130 Civil and Human Rights Organizations Call on President Biden to Commute Federal Death Sentences
WASHINGTON – More than 130 civil and human rights organizations, led by the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International USA, Southern Poverty Law Center, and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, issued a letter to President Biden today, urging him to commute the sentences of people on federal death row before he leaves office. The letter highlights the moral and legal failings of the death penalty in the United States and stresses the urgency of action to prevent the potential resurgence of federal executions under an incoming Trump administration. The groups call on Biden to fulfill his campaign promise to address the irrevocably broken federal death penalty and to “bring America into a new era of moral leadership.” President Biden was the first presidential candidate to openly oppose the death penalty, and his administration issued a moratorium on federal executions. With 40 men still on death row, however, the letter emphasizes that commuting federal death sentences is the only irreversible action President Biden can take to prevent the incoming administration from attempting another execution spree. "President Biden has an opportunity to make history by addressing the racist and unjust federal death penalty system and keep an early campaign promise he made to the American people,” said Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the ACLU. “Commuting the sentences of those on death row would help end the death penalty once and for all and prevent a second execution spree by President Trump. Trump’s first act of political theater ended in the execution of 13 people. President Biden shouldn’t allow Trump to repeat that travesty." In Trump’s final months in office, his administration executed 13 people in rapid succession, more than any administration in over 120 years. The Trump administration also amended the federal execution protocol which opened the door to more brutal methods of execution, including death by firing squad, electrocution, and nitrogen hypoxia, an untested and torturous method. Below are additional comments from: Paul O’Brien, executive director, Amnesty International USA: “President-elect Trump has promised to restart and accelerate the federal death machine, just as he did in his last administration. In the span of only 6 months, the Trump administration executed more people than the 10 previous presidential administrations combined. The executions carried out in his first term demonstrated to the world how the federal death penalty is fundamentally broken and that this ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment should be abolished forever. We should take Trump at his word when he says he plans to repeat this horrific killing spree, and Biden must do what he can now to prevent it.” Janai Nelson, president and director-counsel, Legal Defense Fund: “Since our founding, LDF has been unwavering in its fight to abolish the death penalty and eliminate racial discrimination from our criminal legal system. The death penalty is rooted in slavery, lynchings, and white vigilantism and historically weaponized against people of color. From the Groveland Four in 1949 to many capital cases today, Black people are disproportionately impacted by the ultimate punishment. Commuting the sentences of the 40 individuals on federal death row is an unprecedented opportunity for President Biden to cement his commitment to remedying injustice by exercising executive clemency.” Margaret Huang, president and CEO, The Southern Poverty Law Center: “The death penalty is rooted in a deep history of racialized violence. To this day, race is still the biggest predictor of who gets sentenced to death, with Black people accounting for nearly 40% of those on federal death row, despite representing less than 12% of the adult population. And fully 70% of those on federal death row are from the South. Our nation, and particularly the communities that we serve in the Deep South, cannot achieve true racial justice while the death penalty remains in practice.” Joia Erin Thornton, executive director, FLOCC (Faith Leaders of Color Coalition): “President Biden should commute all federal death sentences because doing so would acknowledge and help redress the racial bias built into the federal death penalty system, allow government resources to be redirected to policies that actually make our communities safer, and allow the families of victims and incarcerated persons to focus on healing instead of living in legal limbo.” This letter is one of more than a dozen letters released today from hundreds of stakeholders from across the political and faith spectrums calling on President Biden to commute all federal death sentences, including Black pastors, former corrections officials, business leaders, current and former prosecutors, families who have lost loved ones to homicide, mental health advocates, and many more. All of the letters can be found here. -
News & CommentaryNov 2024
Capital Punishment
Biden Must Use Final Months in Office to Commute Federal Death SentencesBiden Must Use Final Months in Office to Commute Federal Death Sentences
In our series on how Biden can use the lame duck period to secure civil liberties and civil rights, we examine how Biden can combat President-elect Trump’s plans to greatly expand the death penalty and execute every person on the federal row. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Capital Punishment
National Security
Court Rules Signed Plea Agreements with Three of the 9/11 Defendants Are Valid and Must Go Into EffectCourt Rules Signed Plea Agreements with Three of the 9/11 Defendants Are Valid and Must Go Into Effect
WASHINGTON — A U.S. military court has agreed that the plea agreement reached with ACLU client Khalid Shaikh Mohammad back in August is valid and must go into effect. The judge’s decision comes three months after Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III, overruled prosecutors and Brig. General Susan Escallier, the Guantánamo military commission’s convening authority, and revoked the signed plea agreement. In exchange for a guilty plea to all counts, the U.S. government agreed to life imprisonment instead of the death penalty for Khalid Shaikh Mohammad and two other defendants. The military judge’s decision follows litigation by the three defendants to enforce their agreement with the government. The negotiated plea process allows family members to get answers to long-held questions about the attacks directly from the defendants and, at sentencing, make statements about the tragic impact on them and their loved ones. The military judge has said he will next schedule a hearing for the guilty pleas to be entered. Since 2008, through its John Adams Project, the ACLU has provided capital defense support for detainees facing the death penalty in the military commissions, spending over $12.5 million to provide experienced capital defenders, mitigation specialists, investigators, and experts to the under-resourced military defense teams. Our efforts exposed unfairness, secrecy, and the ongoing role of torture in the Guantanamo military commissions, making clear that the commissions are a complete failure. The following is a statement from Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the ACLU: “By reinstating the plea agreements, Col. Matthew N. McCall rightly recognizes that Defense Secretary Austin stepped out of bounds. We are finally back at the only practical solution after nearly two decades of litigation. “The government's decision to settle for life imprisonment instead of seeking the death penalty in the case of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was always the right call. For too long, the U.S. has repeatedly defended its use of torture and unconstitutional military tribunals at Guantánamo Bay. As a nation, we must move forward with the plea process and sentencing hearing that is intended to give victim family members answers to their questions. They deserve transparency and finality about the events that claimed their loved ones. “This plea agreement further underscores the fact that the death penalty is out of step with the fundamental values of our democratic system. It is inhumane, inequitable, and unjust. “We also urge the U.S. government to quickly relocate the men cleared for transfer, and finally end all indefinite detentions and unfair trials at Guantánamo.”