Groups Secure Temporary Order to Halt Georgia Mass Voter Challenges
ATLANTA — The Southern Poverty Law Center, ACLU of Georgia, American Civil Liberties Union, and Akerman LLP successfully obtained a yesterday to restore the registration status of Oconee County voters who were placed on a “challenge list” within 45 days of the election as a result of mass voter challenges.
In the order, the court also found that state law requires county election officials to stop considering challenges within 45 days of an election, regardless of when the mass challenges were submitted.
The groups brought this claim on behalf of Oconee resident and voter Susan Noakes in .
“As a longtime registered voter in Oconee County, I support my county election administrators,” said Susan Noakes. “But these last-minute voter challenges directly interfere with election officials’ abilities to prepare for the upcoming election and create anxiety and burdens for Oconee voters. I am glad the court stepped in today to affirm the constitutional right to vote.”
“This court order is a win for voters, affirming their right to be on the voter rolls, cast their ballots and ensure those ballots are counted,” stated Poy Winichakul, senior staff attorney, SPLC. “This ruling allows democracy to work for all Georgians.”
The groups had intervened in a lawsuit filed against election officials in Oconee County, Ga. In the original case, a voter asked the court to stop the local board of elections and registration from registering new voters until it held hearings on approximately 230 voters whose registrations were challenged in July.
Earlier this month, the law firms represented Ms. Noakes, an Oconee County voter, in an action to intervene in the case and dismiss the request to sustain the voter challenges. The court granted the motion to intervene and motion to dismiss the case, ultimately stopping mass voter challenges and possible voter roll purges.
“This ruling ensures justice for Oconee County voters and is an authoritative statement that voter challenges should not change the status of voters in the immediate run-up to an election. We look forward to continuing the fight for voters wrongly challenged throughout the state,” said Caitlin May, voting rights attorney, ACLU of Georgia.
“We’re pleased that the court recognized Georgia law's protections against eleventh-hour efforts to prevent people from being able to exercise their right to vote,” added Theresa J. Lee, senior staff attorney, ACLU Voting Rights Project.
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”