First Day of Hearing in Angola Prison Case Highlights Abusive Conditions Youth Endure
The hearing was followed by a press conference where community members denounced the state of Louisiana’s decision to transfer and keep kids in Angola
BATON ROUGE, La. — Yesterday was the first day of a multi-day emergency hearing in which attorneys representing children — nearly all Black boys — incarcerated at the Louisiana State Penitentiary, known as Angola, are making the case for why emergency action should be taken to order the state of Louisiana to remove the children from Angola. At the conclusion of the first day, Louisiana community members held a press conference where they highlighted the abusive conditions in which children have been kept.
Photos from the press conference can be found . Photos provided by Daniella Zalcman.
For over 10 months, Louisiana kids have been held in Angola, nicknamed for the former slave plantation on which the prison was built, and a former death row prison with a record of human rights abuses. Children ages 14 to 18 are being held in solitary confinement, deprived of their education, and separated from their support systems and families. In the ongoing Alex A. v. Edwards lawsuit, children at Angola describe:
- Being placed in solitary confinement for 72 consecutive hours when they arrive, and only being released from their cells for a few minutes to shower.
- Being locked in their cells at times for over 23 hours for punishment, only let out to shower in handcuffs and shackles.
- Being handcuffed and shackled as punishment when they are occasionally allowed to go outside for recreation time.
The following quotes can be attributed as noted.
Alanah Odoms, executive director, ACLU of Louisiana:
“Our children are currently being locked away in cages at Angola. The place in which this maltreatment is taking place is a place of historic shame for the state of Louisiana and for this country. Angola State Penitentiary was a plantation in which enslaved people were forced to labor until their deaths and now their ancestors are being incarcerated and locked away in the same places, and on the same fields. That is a history that we must remember and recognize. We need Governor Edwards and the leaders of the OJJ to stand on the right side of history. We know that our governor has courage; we've seen it exhibited. We need him to stand up for changing this policy today, and change the course of our history going forward.”
Bishop Sredni Autrey, Shreveport Chapter lead, Families and Friends of Louisiana’s Incarcerated Children (FFLIC):
“It is clear that the only thing Governor Edwards and the OJJ have accomplished by moving kids to Angola is further traumatizing them. This move has been directly opposed to what we know and believe in our faith and in our hearts is right for children. We must care for our children a whole lot better than what we are doing.”
Rio Valdez, youth leader, Families and Friends of Louisiana’s Incarcerated Children (FFLIC):
“The problem with our youth justice system is that they are confusing the idea of rehabilitation with punishment, punishment that solves nothing, punishment that only furthers the damage already done. I was headed down the wrong path, and had I not had the support needed from those around me I’d probably be right there with them, being punished by the system, and maybe even locked up in Angola.”
Kristen A. Rome, Co-Executive Director, Louisiana Center for Children’s Rights:
“Our juvenile justice system is designed to rehabilitate the children it serves and we know that rehabilitation starts with access to education, mental health services, and support. It is unconscionable that instead of investing in our children’s rehabilitation, the state has done everything in its power to justify holding them at Angola — a former plantation and one of the most notorious prisons in the country — without a clear plan for their safety, care, education, or reintegration into their communities.”
Cory Levier, Lafayette Chapter, Families and Friends of Louisiana’s Incarcerated Children (FFLIC):
“Right now, these children are locked up in Angola. We all believe if this is not corrected, that they are done for life and that they will not have an opportunity to further advance themselves in any way. That is the message that we are sending them. It is time for American leadership to have American values and to stand up for the Constitution that says we are all equal, we are all free, we all have opportunity and we all have a chance at prosperity.”
Eugene Collins, President, NAACP, Baton Rouge:
“We want these kids to come back and be productive members of society. Housing them in Angola is telling us that you don't care about our kids. It was under Democratic progressive leadership that we decided that these types of facilities were not best to rehabilitate kids. It’s a shame that under Democratic leadership we are putting kids back in those facilities. That does not make sense. These kids need to come out of those facilities. It is not built for children, and it's certainly not built for anybody to rehabilitate themselves.”
The Department of Justice’s statement of interest can be found here.
More information on the case can be found here.
Prisoners' Rights
Alex A. v. Edwards
Prisoners' Rights
Alex A. v. Edwards
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
Press ReleaseDec 2024
Racial Justice
ACLU Statement on House AI Task Force ReportACLU Statement on House AI Task Force Report
WASHINGTON — Today, the House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence (AI) issued its final report, marking an important step in recognizing the serious risks of discrimination and bias posed by AI systems — particularly in law enforcement’s use of facial recognition technology. The report recognizes that discrimination and bias may arise in AI systems due to their design, training data, or failures by end users. The report also investigates the complex considerations around deepfakes, open AI systems, and free speech, and urges Congress to pass narrow legislation to address concrete harms. In response to the House AI Task Force final report, Cody Venzke, senior policy counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, issued the following statement: “The ACLU commends the Task Force for recognizing that AI systems are harming people right now through discriminatory outcomes and supercharged surveillance. Curbing those abuses of AI is not a partisan issue, and more concrete action is needed to protect civil rights, while maintaining states’ authority to build on those protections. The Task Force is appropriately cautious when wrestling with issues around deepfakes, open-source AI, digital identity, and other issues, recognizing that legislators should consider a wide array of tailored tools to address real, not speculative, harms while respecting civil rights and civil liberties.” The House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence report can be found here. -
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Racial Justice
Human Rights
Why the Fight for Racial Justice is a Human Rights IssueWhy the Fight for Racial Justice is a Human Rights Issue
On International Human Rights Day, the ACLU is advocating for a long-sought after reparatory justice to end the continued abuses against Black and brown communities. -
Press ReleaseOct 2024
National Security
+2 Issues
ACLU Warns that Biden-Harris Administration Rules on AI in National Security Lack Key ProtectionsACLU Warns that Biden-Harris Administration Rules on AI in National Security Lack Key Protections
WASHINGTON — The Biden-Harris administration today released its National Security Memorandum on Artificial Intelligence (AI), establishing guidelines for how the U.S. government uses AI in national security programs, such as counterterrorism, intelligence, homeland security, and defense. The use of AI to automate and expand national security activities poses some of the greatest dangers to people’s lives and civil liberties. Agencies are increasingly exploring the use of AI in decisions about who to surveil, who to stop and search at the airport, who to add to government watchlists, and even who is a military target. While the government’s policy includes some important steps forward — such as requiring national security agencies to better track and assess their AI systems for risks and prohibiting a subset of dangerous AI uses — it falls far short in other critical areas, leaving glaring gaps with respect to independent oversight, transparency, notice, and redress. The policy imposes few substantive safeguards on a wide range of AI-driven activities, by and large allowing agencies to decide for themselves how to mitigate the risks posed by national security systems that have immense consequences for people’s lives and rights. As we have repeatedly seen before, this is a recipe for dangerous technologies to proliferate in secret. “Despite acknowledging the considerable risks of AI, this policy does not go nearly far enough to protect us from dangerous and unaccountable AI systems. National security agencies must not be left to police themselves as they increasingly subject people in the United States to powerful new technologies,” said Patrick Toomey, deputy director of ACLU’s National Security Project. “If developing national security AI systems is an urgent priority for the country, then adopting critical rights and privacy safeguards is just as urgent. Without transparency, independent oversight, and built-in mechanisms for individuals to obtain accountability when AI systems err or fail, the policy’s safeguards are inadequate and place our civil rights and civil liberties at risk.” For years, the American Civil Liberties Union has been urging far stronger safeguards and transparency about the AI tools that national security agencies are deploying, the rules constraining their use, and the dangers these systems pose to fairness, privacy, and due process. -
Press ReleaseOct 2024
Racial Justice
ACLU Comment on the Department of Labor’s AI Guidelines for Employers and VendorsACLU Comment on the Department of Labor’s AI Guidelines for Employers and Vendors
WASHINGTON — Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) released a roadmap for artificial intelligence (AI) best practices, designed to ensure that emerging technologies such as AI enhance job quality, benefit workers, and comply with existing employment laws when they are used in the workplace. The best practices, pursuant to President Biden’s executive order on the development and use of AI, include recommendations for AI system developers and employers that prioritize workers’ experiences and empowerment throughout the entire AI lifecycle – from design to use and oversight. These practices also call on employers and developers to create standards and processes to identify and mitigate risks from AI systems, such as threats to health and safety, civil rights, privacy, fair labor rights, and labor organizing prior to a developer marketing them or an employer deploying them, and recommend turning to different systems when sufficient mitigation is not possible. “We applaud DOL for issuing best practices for use of AI that center workers’ empowerment, civil rights, privacy, and safety protections and call on developers and employers to adopt critical guardrails in developing, procuring and using AI systems. Employers and developers should take note, as many have been burying their heads in the sand on their risk of legal liability with respect to AI tools,” said Olga Akselrod, senior staff attorney of the ACLU Racial Justice Program. “Following these best practices for AI can help employers and developers ensure that they do not violate existing civil rights and other employment laws that protect workers.” The best practices also recommend transparency measures through conducting and publishing impact assessments, notice and recourse for impacted workers, and measures to minimize worker displacement. The DOL also stated that employers should minimize electronic monitoring and avoid unnecessary collection or retention of worker data.