Federal Court Permanently Blocks Provision of Florida Law that Targeted Voter Registration and Civic Engagement by Community Organizations
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A federal court today permanently blocked a provision of Florida law that undermines community-based organizations performing voter registration and civic engagement.
The lawsuit, Hispanic Federation v. Byrd, was filed last year by voting and immigrants’ rights advocates and specifically focuses on the law’s noncitizen provision, which would impose a $50,000 fine on an organization for each noncitizen person who “collects” or “handles” voter registration forms on its behalf.
The restrictions included lawful permanent residents, many of whom have long-time, close ties to the communities in which they reside.
Hispanic Federation and Poder Latinx, along with three individual noncitizen plaintiffs, challenged S.B. 7050. They are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Florida, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Dēmos, and Arnold & Porter.
Following a trial held last month in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida, Judge Mark Walker ruled the citizenship requirement is unlawful discrimination in violation of the plaintiffs’ right to equal protection under law.
The following statements are from:
Frankie Miranda, president and CEO of Hispanic Federation: “Today’s order by Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker confirms what we have been saying all along: the noncitizen provision in SB 7050 is unconstitutional, discriminatory, and goes against the very fabric of U.S. democracy. We are happy with this decision, but the truth of the matter is that we had to expend precious time and resources to file this lawsuit to protect the rights of Floridians. We hope this sends a clear message to Florida legislators, Governor DeSantis, and other states that Hispanic Federation and our partners will remain vigilant and continue fighting against attempts to restrict voting rights and upend democracy.”
Yadira Sanchez, executive director, Poder Latinx: “This is a monumental victory for democracy and our communities. By striking down this unjust law that threatened to silence lawful permanent residents, the court has upheld the right of all individuals to participate in their governance. Poder Latinx challenged this draconian measure to protect community-based organizations, which are crucial in voter registration efforts. Today’s ruling reaffirms justice, inclusivity, and equal representation, sending a powerful message that attempts to suppress voter engagement will not be tolerated. We celebrate this triumph and remain committed to advocating for voter rights and ensuring every voice is heard in our democratic process.”
Adriel I. Cepeda Derieux, deputy director, ACLU’s Voting Rights Project: “This ruling is a major victory and a testament to our clients’ tireless commitment to their communities and to our democracy. The law banned people from helping eligible citizens in their communities register to vote — something Florida should encourage, not try to stop.”
Daniel Tilley, legal director, ACLU of Florida: “Today’s ruling is a victory for democracy in our state. This law was an effort to restrict registration of eligible voters who live in immigrant communities, which would limit participation in elections by new Americans who have become eligible voters.”
Miranda Galindo, supervising attorney, LatinoJustice PRLDEF: “Denying noncitizens the ability to help register eligible voters in their communities is unconstitutional and discriminatory. Our clients stood courageously against S.B. 7050 and we are thrilled that today’s victory protects all Floridians wanting to motivate their community to vote. LatinoJustice PRLDEF is dedicated to breaking down barriers to civic engagement and fighting efforts to demonize our vibrant immigrant community.”
Roni Druks, senior counsel, Dēmos: “Today's ruling reaffirms the sanctity of civic engagement and democratic participation. In declaring that S.B. 7050 violates the Fourteenth Amendment, it stands as a victory for immigrant communities in Florida and for the possibility that as a nation we will one day forge a more inclusive, just democracy where all people can shape their futures.”
Today’s ruling is here.
Case background: /cases/hispanic-federation-v-byrd
Voting Rights
Hispanic Federation v. Byrd
Voting Rights
Hispanic Federation v. Byrd
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”