Crystal Mason’s Legal Team Appeals Illegal Voting Conviction
FORT WORTH, Tex. – The ACLU of Texas today presented oral argument in the appeal of Crystal Mason’s five-year sentence for casting a provisional ballot in the 2016 election. The legal team is asking the appellate judges to either acquit Mason or order a new trial.
“Crystal Mason deserves justice,” said Thomas Buser-Clancy, staff attorney for the ACLU of Texas who presented oral argument. “Ms. Mason tried to do the right thing, her civic duty, and in return, has been sentenced to five years in prison. We are hopeful that the Justices will overturn her conviction and allow Ms. Mason to continue working to improve her life and that of her family.”
“I am hopeful that the justices understood that my conviction was unfair and shouldn’t stand,” said Crystal Mason, defendant challenging her conviction. “I just want justice here. For a fair chance. And for the justices to see that I don’t deserve this. I have faith in God and believe that whatever happens is in his plan.”
Crystal Mason was criminally prosecuted and sentenced to five years in prison for casting a provisional ballot that was not counted in the November 2016 election. In today's oral argument in the appeal of her case, Mason’s legal team argued that she did not know the state considered her ineligible to vote because she had already completed her sentence. In addition, the legal team is arguing that as Mason’s provisional ballot was not counted, it does not qualify as a vote, and so she can't be prosecuted for illegally voting.
“We are proud to be in court today with Crystal who courageously stepped forward to challenge an injustice that was done to her,” said Beth Stevens, voting rights legal director for the Texas Civil Rights Project. “No one should be incarcerated for making, at worst, an unintentional mistake while trying to exercise their civic duty. These are efforts meant to strike fear in the hearts of eligible but vulnerable voters and to scare them away from exercising their rights. These thinly-veiled attempts at voter suppression must stop.”
“Ms. Mason’s case is part of a larger pattern that we’ve seen play out time and time again,” said Sophia Lin Lakin, staff attorney for the ACLU Voting Rights Project.“Laws supposedly about protecting election integrity are being wielded to suppress the vote. We will continue to fight for Ms. Mason and other individuals who are being similarly targeted.”
Mason is represented by the ACLU of Texas, the ACLU Voting Rights Project, Texas Civil Rights Project, Allison Grinter, and Kim Cole.
Voting Rights
Crystal Mason v. State of Texas
Voting Rights
Crystal Mason v. State of Texas
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”