Court Rules Lawsuit to Allow All Missourians to Vote by Mail Without a Notary During COVID-19 Can Proceed
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — The Missouri Supreme Court has ruled the lawsuit seeking to allow all Missouri voters to vote by mail without a notary during COVID-19 can proceed.
The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Missouri, and Missouri Voter Protection Coalition on behalf of the NAACP of Missouri, the League of Women Voters of Missouri, and several individuals.
The state legislature recently expanded access to vote by mail to all voters during COVID-19 following the lawsuit, but did not exempt all voters from having to put their health at risk in order to satisfy the notary requirement.
The following reactions are from:
Sophia Lin Lakin, deputy director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, who argued the Supreme Court case: “This decision is a big victory for Missouri voters. The court ruled that our lawsuit to make sure all eligible voters can vote by mail without a notary during COVID-19 can continue.”
Tony Rothert of the ACLU of Missouri: “All Missouri voters should be allowed to participate in this year’s elections without putting themselves and their loved ones at risk by having unnecessary contact with third parties. In response to our lawsuit, the legislature provided some relief to some voters, but we are gratified that the Supreme Court recognized we have a valid case on behalf of all voters.”
Denise Lieberman, lawsuit co-counsel and general counsel to the Missouri Voter Protection Coalition: “We are gratified that the Supreme Court unanimously agreed that Missouri voters have a ‘real’ and ‘substantial’ claim to ensure they can vote safely in the midst of this pandemic with the upcoming elections ahead. No one should have to choose between their health and their right to vote. We look forward to bringing the claims of the people back to the court for relief.”
Nimrod Chapel, Jr., president of the Missouri State Conference of the NAACP: “The NAACP stands ready to defend the rights of people in court, and this decision validates the importance of voting as a fundamental right in our Constitution. While people demonstrate in the streets and the legislature pushes Jim Crow legislation to restrict voting and attacks on workers, voters must have redress at the ballot box and in the courts. Republican attempts to reduce the ability of minorities to vote with wrong-minded barriers will fail as they have historically, even in the face of this pandemic.”
Evelyn Maddox, president of the League of Women Voters of Missouri: “The League encourages the Missouri General Assembly to move our state forward with no-excuse, no-notary absentee ballots for all future elections.”
The case, Missouri NAACP v. Missouri, was filed in Circuit Court of Cole County, Mo.
Ruling: /legal-document/order-4
Statement: /press-releases/court-rules-all-missourians-can-vote-mail-without-notary-during-covid-19
Case details: /cases/missouri-naacp-v-missouri-0
Voting Rights
Missouri NAACP v. Missouri
Voting Rights
Missouri NAACP v. Missouri
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”