Black Voters in South Carolina Urge U.S. Supreme Court to Deny Stay in Racial Gerrymandering Case
State Has Asked to Use Discriminatory Congressional Map in 2024
WASHINGTON — South Carolina should not be able to hold elections using racially gerrymandered congressional districts in this year’s elections, according to a filed Monday in the case Alexander v. South Carolina Conference of the NAACP.
Voters in South Carolina are awaiting a decision from the nation’s highest court in the case. With South Carolina’s non-presidential primary elections scheduled for June 11, the state of South Carolina asked for a stay March 18 in the case to use a Congressional voting map that a lower court found unconstitutional for undermining the rights of Black voters. It would be the second time this map would be in place for congressional elections since its enactment in 2022.
Attorneys with the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, and ACLU of South Carolina, who are representing the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and individual plaintiff Taiwan Scott, Monday urging the Court to deny the stay and not reward the State for its delay and failure to draw an alternative map. They also demonstrated that ample time still remains for the Legislature to enact a new map this year.
The response can be found .
“The NAACP has worked fervently, for decades, to protect access to the ballot for Black Americans and will not stand idly by as the rights of thousands of South Carolinians are overlooked,” said Brenda Murphy, president of the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP. “Our state legislature must prioritize the integrity of our democracy by enacting a new map created in fairness for all voters. We cannot allow the voices of our residents to be silenced in these crucial election cycles.”
"Granting a stay to utilize racially gerrymandered districts in South Carolina's elections would not only undermine the rights of Black voters but also perpetuate systemic injustice," said individual plaintiff Taiwan Scott. "We cannot allow delay tactics to impede progress towards fair and equitable representation in our democracy."
Background: The U.S. Supreme Court case comes after the South Carolina legislature adopted a racially gerrymandered congressional map in 2022 that moved hundreds of thousands of South Carolinians to different congressional districts, including moving more than two-thirds of Black Charlestonians out of that one county.
A panel of three federal judges unanimously ruled in January 2023 that the South Carolina General Assembly had drawn Congressional District 1, anchored in Charleston and coastal South Carolina, was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander drawn with a discriminatory purpose. The South Carolina legislature appealed that decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, and oral arguments in the case were heard on Oct. 11, 2023.
Voting Rights
Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP (Congressional Map Challenge)
Voting Rights
Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP (Congressional Map Challenge)
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”