ACLU Sues Kalamazoo County Election Official to Ensure Election Certification Laws Are Followed
DETROIT – The ACLU of Michigan and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit today against a member of the Kalamazoo Board of County Canvassers who, according to statements attributed to him in indicated his willingness to violate Michigan’s Constitution and election law if he disagrees with the results of the upcoming presidential election.
Robert Froman, one of four members of a county board whose legal duty is to certify election results, reportedly told the newspaper that he “most definitely” believes the 2020 election was stolen from former President Donald Trump. Asked if he would certify the 2024 election if it unfolded the same way, Mr. Froman allegedly replied, “No. And that’s why I’m there.” Elsewhere in the article, Mr. Froman reportedly said, “I am not going to do anything that’s illegal,” but seemingly without recognition that refusing to certify the election would, in fact, violate the law.
The Michigan Constitution and a state statute require canvassers to certify election results within 14 days after the election based solely on the total number of votes reported from each location within their jurisdiction. The law does not allow them to withhold certification.
But Mr. Froman’s alleged statements are in line with a widely reported anti-democratic trend of election denialism in which local officials in Michigan and throughout the country have threatened to interfere with the election certification process.
In 2020 two members of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers initially voted against certifying the results of the election based on false allegations of fraud in Detroit and were personally pressured by President Trump not to sign certification documents. Earlier this year, the Delta County Board of Canvassers initially refused to certify the results of elections for county offices based on unfounded allegations of voter fraud. Similar concerns about potential refusals to certify election results have been reported in swing states such as Nevada, Colorado, Georgia, and Arizona.
In Michigan, the failure of a board of county canvassers to certify an election would require the board of state canvassers to take over the county board’s duties. As explained in the ACLU lawsuit, such an event would impose burdensome costs on voters, add to the work that the state board must complete under short and strict deadlines, and promote partisan conspiracy theories that undermine public confidence in American democracy.
Following publication of the Detroit News article on August 5, the ACLU contacted Mr. Froman about the quotes attributed to him. Mr. Froman stated, “I did not make any of the statements you say I did.”
Asked in a from the ACLU to correct the record, Mr. Froman refused to contact the paper and request a retraction. He also did not deny that he, in fact, would refuse to certify an election result with which he did not agree, such as the 2020 election. The ACLU communicated Mr. Froman’s denial to the Detroit News, and the paper responded, stating that it stands by its reporting.
This all led to the ACLU filing today’s lawsuit in Kalamazoo County Circuit Court seeking a court order formally declaring that Mr. Froman is legally required to certify the election results. The ACLU’s lawsuit explains that the dispute must be resolved by a court now because of the harm that could occur if Mr. Froman defies his legal duties during the short 14-day window for certification following the November election.
Phil Mayor, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Michigan, said this about the lawsuit: “For democracy to work election officials at all levels must put adherence to the law above partisanship. The lawsuit filed today seeks to ensure that the people of Kalamazoo County and, indeed, all Michiganders can continue participating in fair elections in which their ballots are accurately counted and the results properly certified. This lawsuit should also send the message to all election officials that the ACLU and other pro-democracy organizations are on guard and ready to act if voters’ right to a free and fair election is flouted by election officials for partisan gain.”
Theresa Lee, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, said: “We’re bringing this lawsuit because attacks on our democracy cannot stand. It is critical the court make clear that county canvassers have a legal duty to certify the election based on the tabulated votes. That’s how democracy works.”
Voting Rights
ACLU of Michigan v. Froman
Voting Rights
ACLU of Michigan v. Froman
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”