吃瓜大本营

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. 鈥� The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled today that our Constitution doesn鈥檛 automatically provide Minnesotans on felony probation with the right to vote upon release from incarceration.

The Restore the Vote MN coalition, which the ACLU-MN is part of, announced it will keep pressing urgently to pass a voting rights bill in the state Senate; the bill already passed the House.

鈥淲hile it鈥檚 unfortunate this ruling upholds the perpetuation of disenfranchisement and mutes the voices of people as they re-enter society, we鈥檙e excited to continue moving forward in the Legislature, where we fully expect the Senate to restore the vote and end this exclusion of thousands of people,鈥� said Brian Fullman, a lead organizer with RTVMN partners ISAIAH and Faith in Minnesota. 鈥淲e鈥檒l be outside the Senate and packing the galleries, encouraging lawmakers to make the right decision.鈥�

Current state law bars people who are on felony supervision or probation from voting, even if they have finished serving a prison term, or have never served a day in prison. They cannot vote even though they live in the community, work jobs, raise families and pay taxes. The American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU-MN and pro bono counsel at Faegre Drinker filed Schroeder v. Minnesota Secretary of State to end this disenfranchisement.

鈥淥ur clients simply want the basic right to vote,鈥� said Craig Coleman, a partner with Faegre Drinker. 鈥淣o one in this litigation has ever claimed that there is any purpose served by excluding them from voting. With this decision, it is imperative that the Minnesota Legislature take action to extend the right to vote to all Minnesotans living in the community.鈥�

The nearly 50,000 Minnesotans who the state bars from voting live in every county of our state. They are disproportionately Black, Indigenous and Latinx: Black people comprise about 6% of Minnesota鈥檚 voting-age population, but 24% of these disenfranchised voters; Native people, about 1.5% of the voting-age population and 7.5% of the disenfranchised; and Latinx people about 3% of the voting-age population but 6% of the disenfranchised.

鈥淲e believe the law is discriminatory, leading to racial disparities in voting that in turn lead to political inequality,鈥� said ACLU-MN staff attorney David McKinney. 鈥淭he criminal legal system鈥檚 goal is rehabilitation, redemption, and helping people rejoin their communities 鈥� this law clearly serves none of those purposes. The court鈥檚 ruling presents a golden opportunity for the Senate to join the House in demonstrating its belief in voting rights and end this disenfranchisement.鈥�

鈥淭his ruling puts Minnesota at odds with the growing recognition that felon disenfranchisement laws are racially discriminatory and prevent people who have returned to their communities from having their voices heard in our democratic process,鈥� said Julie Ebenstein, senior staff attorney with the ACLU鈥檚 Voting Rights Project, adding that in the past few years alone, Iowa, Kentucky, and Washington, D.C., have all expanded rights restoration.

Plaintiff Jen Schroeder was sentenced to 40 years of probation for a drug possession charge. She鈥檚 now a mother and a trained addiction counselor. Yet today鈥檚 Supreme Court ruling means she cannot vote until she is 71.

鈥淚 am angered by the Supreme Court鈥檚 decision, which means I can鈥檛 vote until I am 71,鈥� Schroeder said. 鈥淏y ruling against our case, the Minnesota Supreme Court has said that what I am doing, who I have become, is not enough. I and 53,000 other disenfranchised Minnesotans deserve to be treated as full members of society, not barred from voting for 40 years.鈥�

The case was filed in Ramsey County District Court in October 2019. The Minnesota Court of Appeals issued its ruling in May 2021, and the ACLU team argued the appeal before the Minnesota Supreme Court on Nov. 30, 2021.

View the court ruling at .