ACLU Recognizes Leaders in Reproductive Freedom and Racial Justice with Prestigious Civil Liberties Awards
ATLANTA — The American Civil Liberties Union announced today that Cecile Richards and Paul Butler have been selected as recipients of two prestigious biennial awards recognizing lifetime achievements and contributions to civil rights and civil liberties.
Cecile Richards, the former president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America and co-founder of women’s political action group Supermajority, was awarded the Roger N. Baldwin Medal of Liberty, the ACLU’s highest honor acknowledging individuals who have made lifetime contributions to the advancement of civil liberties. The medal, first awarded in 1989 and named for ACLU founder Roger N. Baldwin, comes with a cash award of $30,000.
Paul Butler, a former prosecutor and current professor at Georgetown University Law Center, was awarded the ACLU Presidential Prize, which is granted to a full-time academic in any discipline to honor outstanding, lifetime contributions to civil rights and liberties in academia. The prize was first awarded in 2013.
“Cecile Richards and Paul Butler have both fought for decades to defend and advance civil rights and liberties. At Planned Parenthood, Cecile Richards led the charge to defend reproductive freedom amid unprecedented attacks, working alongside the ACLU and others to challenge abortion bans and restrictions in the courts, and advocating for expanded protections for reproductive rights at the ballot box and in statehouses. Paul Butler, both as a prosecutor and professor at Georgetown, has been a powerful voice shedding light on the racism that continues to infect the criminal legal system,” said Deborah N. Archer, ACLU president. “We are thrilled for this opportunity to acknowledge their work and contributions with the ACLU’s highest honors.”
Cecile Richards started her career in the labor movement, working as an organizer for service workers including garment workers, nursing home workers, and janitors. She later served as deputy chief of staff for former Speaker Nancy Pelosi before being named president of the Planned Parenthood Foundation of America. During her time at Planned Parenthood, she worked to expand access to birth control and other reproductive health care under the Affordable Care Act, expanded Planned Parenthood’s services, and stood up against an onslaught of abortion bans long before Roe v. Wade was overturned. After leading the organization for 12 years, Richards left and later founded Supermajority, a women’s political action group that seeks to train and mobilize women to be organizers, activists, and leaders. She was named one of TIME Magazine’s 100 Most Influential People in the World in 2011 and 2012.
Paul Butler is a leading scholar on issues involving race and the criminal legal system. Prior to joining academia, he was a prosecutor with the Justice Department, working on cases involving public corruption during which he brought cases against a U.S. senator, FBI agents, and a number of law enforcement officers. Since joining Georgetown University Law Center, Butler has authored numerous scholarly articles, books, and columns; delivered lectures before the ABA, NAACP, and numerous colleges; and has been recognized with the Distinguished Faculty Service Award thrice.
The awards will be bestowed this Saturday, June 8 at the ACLU’s Biennial Leadership Conference in Atlanta.
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Civil Liberties
We Need to Know More About State Supreme Court CasesWe Need to Know More About State Supreme Court Cases
State Supreme Courts interpret laws that impact some of the most intimate parts of our lives. Communities have a right to know what’s on the docket. -
Press ReleaseDec 2024
Civil Liberties
New ACLU Report Reveals Most State Supreme Courts Fail to Meet Key Transparency MeasuresNew ACLU Report Reveals Most State Supreme Courts Fail to Meet Key Transparency Measures
NEW YORK — Nearly half of all state supreme courts across the country fail to regularly post new cases they are considering, with only six meeting four key transparency measures already implemented by the U.S. Supreme Court, according to a new report published today by the American Civil Liberties Union. The report identifies significant steps that state supreme courts should take to inform the public about their cases, which have only grown in importance as the federal judiciary has become more hostile to protecting core rights and advocates have turned to state protections and state court litigation in response. Based on an analysis of the practices and policies of the highest courts in each state, including D.C., the report “Scorecard for State Supreme Court Transparency: How Does Your State Stack Up?” ranks each state supreme court in five tiers based on compliance with four key transparency measures. These measures include posting new cases online in a timely manner, providing timely information about legal issues presented by cases, making dockets accessible and free for the public, and making merits briefing accessible and free for the public. “State courts regularly hear — and are the final word on — cases affecting abortion rights, voting rights, criminal justice reform, and more. Yet, in many instances, the highest state courts do not provide meaningful public access to information about cases affecting the rights and liberties of millions of people. We urge state supreme courts to bring more transparency to the critical work they do,” said Julie Murray, co-director of the ACLU’s State Supreme Court Initiative. “In the face of a federal judiciary increasingly unwilling to protect core rights and an incoming administration that threatens to exacerbate that problem, state courts are an important defense for our liberty. They should be leaders in transparency, too,” said Bridget Lavender, Skadden Fellow with the Initiative. The report emphasizes that state courts “play an outsized role” in many parts of the law, but their ability to “guard our liberties depends in significant part on whether those courts adopt transparent processes.” It further highlights that state supreme courts have led the way on enormously consequential decisions in recent years. In particular, some state supreme courts have recognized the right of same sex couples to marry, and did so long before federal courts. They have also declared the death penalty unconstitutional under state law despite contrary federal law, protected access to reproductive health care as a right even as that right was being stripped away at the federal level, and provided more robust protection to people subject to unreasonable searches and seizures. The report urges state supreme courts to take action to improve their transparency practices, taking notes from the courts that have already implemented these measures. It notes that regularly posting new cases and the issues they represent, and providing timely access to dockets and merits briefing allows the public, the press, and the legal community to track cases as they unfold, identify cases with statewide consequences, and understand what’s at stake. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
National Security
+2 Issues
ACLU Urges House to Kill Bill that Could Give Trump Admin Power to Crush Dissent and Go After Political EnemiesACLU Urges House to Kill Bill that Could Give Trump Admin Power to Crush Dissent and Go After Political Enemies
WASHINGTON — The American Civil Liberties Union strongly urges the House of Representatives to vote NO on H.R. 9495, the Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act, which would grant Donald Trump and his handpicked secretary of the Treasury power to investigate and effectively shut down any tax-exempt organization — including news outlets, universities, and civil society groups — by stripping them of tax-exempt status based on an unilateral accusation of wrongdoing. “Passing this bill would hand the incoming Trump administration a dangerous new tool it could use to stifle free speech, target political opponents, and punish disfavored groups,” said Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU. “The freedom to dissent without fear of government retribution is a vital part of any well-functioning democracy, which is why Congress must block H.R. 9495 before it’s too late.” While there is a 90-day “cure” period in which a designated nonprofit can mount a defense, it is a mere illusion of due process. The government may deny organizations its reasons and evidence against them, leaving the nonprofit unable to rebut allegations. This means that a nonprofit could be left entirely in the dark about what conduct the government believes qualifies as "support," making it virtually impossible to clear its name. Last month, the ACLU and a diverse array of over 130 other tax-exempt organizations — including human rights, reproductive health, and immigrants’ rights groups — wrote to Congress urging them to vote no. The letter also explains that the groups do not oppose the provisions in H.R. 9495 that relate to preventing the IRS from imposing fines and penalties on hostages while they are held abroad. Indeed, these provisions have already passed the Senate on their own, and if the House of Representatives were to pass a version of this bill that did not include the text of H.R. 6408, it could be sent immediately to President Biden for his signature. -
News & CommentaryNov 2024
Civil Liberties
Donald Trump Will Return to the White House in January. The ACLU is Ready.Donald Trump Will Return to the White House in January. The ACLU is Ready.
Starting in 2016, the ACLU filed more than 400 legal actions against Trump and his administration. As Trump returns to the White House, we’re ready to return to the courts and Congress to fight for our civil liberties.