吃瓜大本营

NEW YORK 鈥� The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Ohio, and Outten & Golden LLP announced a first-of-its-kind class action settlement with JPMorgan Chase (Chase) on behalf of male employees who allege they were unlawfully denied access to paid parental leave on the same terms as mothers from 2011 to 2017.

Under the proposed class settlement, filed today in an Ohio federal court, Chase will continue to maintain its current gender neutral parental leave policy, which was clarified following the filing of Mr. Rotondo鈥檚 discrimination charge, train those administering the policy on its gender neutral application, and pay $5 million to fathers who claim they were denied the opportunity to take additional paid parental leave as primary caregivers.

The Chase settlement is the first class action lawsuit to settle sex discrimination claims for a class of fathers who claim they were denied the opportunity to receive equal paid parental leave given to mothers.

鈥淚 love my children, and all I wanted was to spend time with them when they were born,鈥� said Derek Rotondo, the Chase employee who filed the sex discrimination charge that led to the class settlement. 鈥淚鈥檓 proud that since I filed my charge, Chase has clarified its policy to ensure that both male and female employees who wish to be the primary parental caregiver have equal access to those benefits.鈥�

In a class complaint filed today along with the settlement, Mr. Rotondo alleges that when he sought to take 14 weeks of 鈥減rimary caregiver鈥� leave after his son was born, he was told by Chase鈥檚 H.R. department that mothers were presumptively considered primary caregivers, eligible for the full 16 weeks of paid parental leave, while fathers were eligible for two weeks of paid parental leave unless they could show that their spouses or partners were incapacitated or had returned to work.

In 2016, Chase increased the overall amount of paid parental leave available to its employees from 12 weeks to 16 weeks, with non-primary caregivers receiving two weeks of paid parental leave. This was far above the average paid parental leave available at most American companies. (As of mid-2018, Chase provides nonprimary caregivers with six weeks of paid parental leave.) Mr. Rotondo鈥檚 lawsuit recognizes the generosity of Chase鈥檚 parental leave policy, but insisted that the full amount of primary caregiver leave should be equally available to men and women.

鈥淲e are pleased to have reached an agreement in this matter and look forward to more effectively communicating the policy so that all men and women employees are aware of their benefits,鈥� said Reid Broda, JPMorgan Chase & Co. Associate General Counsel. 鈥淲e thank Mr. Rotondo for bringing the matter to our attention.鈥�

In June 2017, Mr. Rotondo filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging that Chase鈥檚 policies and practices constituted sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act and state law. Shortly after the charge was filed, Chase granted Mr. Rotondo the full 16 weeks of caregiver leave, and in December 2017 Chase clarified its policy to ensure equal access to all those seeking to serve as the primary caregiver to their new child, regardless of gender.

鈥淲hile sixteen weeks of parental leave is quite generous, and we wish more companies would follow Chase鈥檚 lead, caregiving leave must also be offered on an equal basis to men and women,鈥� said Galen Sherwin, senior staff attorney with the ACLU鈥檚 Women鈥檚 Rights Project. 鈥淯nfortunately, the gender stereotype that raising children is a woman鈥檚 job is still prevalent, and is reflected in far too many corporate policies. We are pleased that Chase is committed to ensuring that its parental leave system meets the needs of today鈥檚 families.鈥�

鈥淎ll parents, regardless of their sex, deserve fair paid leave,鈥� said Peter Romer-Friedman, an Outten & Golden civil rights attorney. 鈥淓ven as some companies like Chase expand the amount of paid leave to their employees, it is important for all to remember that these policies must follow our historic civil rights laws. We hope that other fathers like Derek Rotondo will take a stand for gender equality at their companies. Derek鈥檚 courageous action in this case will benefit thousands of families.鈥�

鈥淧aid parental leave is crucial for all parents, and it should be up to families, not employers, what their caregiving arrangements will look like,鈥� said Freda Levenson, legal director for the ACLU of Ohio. 鈥淚n order for women to compete on an even playing field at work, we need to ensure that men can play an active role at home.鈥�

In today鈥檚 filing, Mr. Rotondo is seeking approval from the court to certify a class of male Chase employees who were denied paid primary caregiver leave and preliminarily approve a settlement between the class of dads and Chase. The settlement creates a $5 million fund to compensate the class members, as well as to pay legal fees and administrative costs. Before the settlement can go into effect, the district court will need to provide notice to the class members about their rights under the settlement, allow the class members to file claim forms to receive compensation from the settlement fund, and hold a hearing to determine whether the settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable. Chase is not admitting liability in the settlement.

The ACLU mourns the tragic loss of Lenora Lapidus, director of the ACLU鈥檚 Women鈥檚 Rights Project, who was one of the senior attorneys on this case. The Women鈥檚 Rights Project was co-founded by Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1970. Lenora saw the Rotondo v. Chase case as a continuation of Justice Ginsburg鈥檚 strategy during her tenure at the ACLU of representing men as caregivers in order to break down gender stereotypes. She was very pleased with the result in this case, and hoped that it would have a ripple effect and cause other companies to adopt more equitable parental leave policies. Chase extends its condolences on Lenora鈥檚 tragic passing.

The Complaint, Settlement Agreement, and Motion for Preliminary Approval can be found here: /cases/jp-morgan-chase-eeoc-complaint

More information about the case can be found here: