ACLU Comment on Supreme Court Action in Pennsylvania Uncounted Ballot Challenge
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has denied a request to halt a unanimous federal appeals court ruling that required the counting of 257 timely received mail ballots in Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, which had been excluded from the 2021 election due to the lack of a handwritten date on an outer return envelope.
A Lehigh County judicial candidate in a disputed race unsuccessfully sought the stay from the Supreme Court.
In its ruling late last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that “Ignoring ballots because the outer envelope was undated, even though the ballot was indisputably received before the deadline for voting[,] serves no purpose other than disenfranchising otherwise qualified voters.” The Supreme Court’s decision today clears the path for the appeals court’s ruling to be enforced and for all 257 ballots to be counted.
The case is being litigated by the ACLU of Pennsylvania and American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of five county voters.
The following is reaction to today’s Supreme Court action:
Reggie Shuford, executive director of the ACLU of Pennsylvania: “Voters have historically been disenfranchised by barriers that are not relevant to a person’s eligibility to vote or their choice to participate in elections. That’s why the Civil Rights Act prohibits disenfranchising eligible voters for paperwork errors that are not relevant to their eligibility, like handwriting a date on the return envelope of their mail ballot.
“Our voter clients and all 257 people in Lehigh County impacted by this issue deserve to have their ballots counted, and we are grateful that reason and the law have prevailed. It’s time to count these votes.
“In future elections, this issue could impact thousands of voters in Pennsylvania. We are hopeful that this ruling diminishes the likelihood of disenfranchisement of voters for what is a simple human error.”
Ari Savitzky, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, who argued the Third Circuit case:
“Every vote matters, and every valid vote should be counted. Voters may not be disenfranchised for a minor paperwork error like this one. The Third Circuit was correct in unanimously reaching that conclusion. We are thrilled for these voters that their ballots can finally now be counted, consistent with the requirements of federal law.”
Ruling: /legal-document/ritter-v-migliori-supreme-court-stay-denial-order
Case details:
Migliori v. Lehigh County Board of Elections is part of the ACLU's Joan and Irwin Jacobs Supreme Court Docket.
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”