The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania filed a lawsuit Tuesday challenging the state’s discriminatory voter ID law. Pennsylvania joins a growing number of states that have enacted voter suppression measures which will keep minority voters, African-Americans in particular, from casting a ballot. The new law is set to go into effect just in time to keep many long-time Pennsylvania voters from the polls in this year’s presidential election.
Viviette Applewhite is a 93-year-old African-American who has voted in almost every election since 1960. Viviette marched for civil rights with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in Macon, Georgia. Her daughter was a public servant. She has five grandchildren, nine great grandchildren, and four great-great grandchildren. But today, Viviette cannot vote in Pennsylvania because she does not have the necessary ID under the state’s new voter ID law.
Please note that by playing this clip YouTube and Google will place a long-term cookie on your computer. Please see on their website and on theirs to learn more. To view the ACLU's privacy statement, click here.
The voter ID law, signed by Gov. Thomas Corbett on March 14, requires voters casting ballots in person to present ID from a limited list of photo IDs, including driver’s licenses issued by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) and government-issued employee ID. Many otherwise acceptable photo IDs, such as those of issued by Pennsylvania colleges and universities and the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, will no longer be accepted because they lack the required expiration dates.
Voters now have to jump through costly and burdensome hoops to get the required ID; they must either produce a raised-seal birth certificate or an official Social Security card. But some people simply cannot obtain a birth certificate either because one was never issued, records were destroyed, or because of clerical errors when recording the birth. The $10 non-waivable fee to obtain a birth certificate doesn’t include the time and money needed for travel and postage, which for many voters is a significant obstacle.
Although Secretary of State Carol Aichele has publicly stated that all voters who need a photo ID to vote will be able to obtain a free ID from PennDOT, the reality for those seeking them has been very different. Dozens of reports have been received about the agency’s refusal to issue free IDs either because people have had an ID in the past or their ID has not been expired long enough, or they don’t replace lost ones for free, or for people with outstanding child support and fines.
In addition to the complaint, the ACLU of Pennsylvania has filed a motion for preliminary injunction with the court to ensure every voter can get to the polls for the general election.
More information about the case, including client videos and a copy of the complaint, can be found at:
Learn more about voting rights: Sign up for breaking news alerts, , and .
Learn More About the Issues on This Page
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”