Today is , a non-partisan celebration of the right to vote and a nationally-coordinated effort to register thousands of voters. Unless, of course, you live in Kansas.
While volunteers all over the country have mobilized to register eligible voters and encourage participation in the democratic process, Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach has erected unnecessary barriers to registration. In the past nine months, the “suspense” list of Kansan would-be voters who the state has not yet registered has grown to 17,000.
Last year, Kansas passed a law requiring that first time voters provide proof of citizenship in addition to fulfilling the requirements on the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) federal form. The Kansas law is similar to the Arizona law the Supreme Court struck down in the case Arizona v. Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona.
Following the Supreme Court decision, Kansas has said that they would “accept and use” voter registration applications, but still require proof of citizenship to complete a registration. In violation of the NVRA, applicants for registration are not added to the voter rolls, but are put on a “suspense list” and are not registered to vote until they provide proof of citizenship. The proof of citizenship requirement is a distinction without a real difference from the Arizona “accept and use” question, except that the additional proof requirement comes at a slightly later time.
As a result, 17,100 people have been put on the suspense list since January, about one-third of the people who have tried to register to vote. Approximately 80 percent of people tried to register at the Division of Motor Vehicles. It appears that many of the applicants who seek to register at the DMV are showing proof of citizenship to get a license (or have shown proof in the past and are renewing their license), but are still added to the suspense list.
In the meantime, Kobach is not concerned because "[t]hese are mostly casual registrants, many of whom do not intend to vote.” Along with the Secretary of State of Arizona, he is suing the Election Assistance Commission under the APA to get them to add the proof of citizenship to the federal form as a state instruction.
In 2008, six million Americans didn't vote because they missed a registration deadline or didn't know how to register. As most of us try to ensure that eligible voters are not left out of the next election, Kansas’s suspense list is growing by the thousands.
Learn more about voting rights and other civil liberties issues: Sign up for breaking news alerts, , and .
Learn More About the Issues on This Page
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”