The ACLU Is on the Ground in Five States Protecting Americans’ Right to Vote This Election Day
Tomorrow the U.S. will hold the first presidential election since 1965 without the full protection of the Voting Rights Act.
Since 2008, states across the country have passed measures to make it harder for Americans — particularly African-Americans, the elderly, students, and people with disabilities — to exercise their fundamental right to vote and have their vote counted. States have cut early voting, enacted voter ID laws, purged voter rolls, and made it more difficult for qualified voters to register. Many of these changes took place in 2013 in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County, which allowed states to pass election laws without preclearance from the federal government.
As the ACLU continues to litigate these suppressive measures in the courts, we also provide direct nonpartisan assistance to voters during the election. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project will be on the ground on Election Day in five key states to protect voters’ right to vote and have their vote counted free from interference, intimidation, or discrimination.
Florida: The ACLU will be on the ground in Florida — which has 29 electoral votes and its share of Election Day issues. We will be working with partners across the state to monitor polling places and ensure that election administration issues are addressed on the spot. The ACLU recently intervened in a lawsuit seeking to extend the voter registration period on account of Hurricane Matthew, which allowed 102,996 Floridians to submit voter registration applications during the five-day extension.
Wisconsin: After years of litigation, a federal court determined that Wisconsin voters must be given a free voter ID card at the DMV that they can then use as identification at the polls. The ACLU will ensure that voters who do not have qualifying ID can cast provisional ballots and seek to obtain ID immediately thereafter to have their vote counted.
Ohio: The ACLU will be in Cleveland ensuring proper access to the polls in poor neighborhoods and monitoring complaints of voter intimidation.
Pennsylvania: The ACLU will be on the ground in Philadelphia observing polling places and ensuring that communities are protected from hostility or intimidation.
North Carolina: Despite a court decision holding that North Carolina had intentionally discriminated against African American voters, the state curtailed early voting by severely limiting the number of polling places available during the first week of the early voting period. The ACLU and its partners will be on the ground to monitor the polls on Election Day.
Wyoming: Following press reports that naturalized citizens may be asked to provide documentary proof of citizenship at the polls — a discriminatory policy not required of native-born citizens — the ACLU sent a to the Wyoming secretary of state explaining why the policy is unconstitutional. We will be monitoring the election and would like to hear from Wyoming voters who are affected by this unconstitutional policy.
As always, ACLU affiliates will be engaged in every state on Election Day.
False claims of a “rigged” election directly threaten the democratic process and undermine confidence in its administration and outcome. These claims belittle the real challenges of voter suppression American voters have faced at the polls in recent years. The ACLU has litigated cases in North Carolina, Wisconsin, Ohio, and Kansas since 2013. In not one could the state produce evidence of the “fraud” that they claim justified their suppressive measures. For example, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals noted that despite three years of litigation, North Carolina had failed to identify even a single individual charged with committing in-person voter fraud.
The real problem is voter suppression. States’ suppressive laws directed at our most vulnerable citizens are, as the Fourth Circuit put it, “solutions in search of a problem.”
If you need assistance on Election Day nationwide, call:
866-OUR-VOTE (687-8682) (English)
888-VE-Y-VOTA (839-8682) (Spanish)
888-API-VOTE (274-8683) (Cantonese, Korean, Mandarin, Thai, and Vietnamese)
Learn More About the Issues on This Page
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Voting Rights
Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?Election Day is Over. Why is the Electoral College Voting Now?
The Electoral College meets December 17th to certify the results of the 2024 election, but why? The ACLU breaks down if the process is worth keeping. -
New York Supreme CourtDec 2024
Voting Rights
New York Communities for Change v. Nassau CountyNew York Communities for Change v. Nassau County
This case in New York state court centers on the landmark John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA) and the New York Municipal Home Rule Law (MHRL). The NYVRA, like several other state voting rights acts enacted in recent years, expands upon the federal Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial vote dilution. The MHRL prohibits racial discrimination and partisan gerrymandering in local-level redistricting. The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the New York Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Steptoe LLP filed a lawsuit on behalf of voters of color in Nassau County, New York alleging that a redistricting plan implemented in 2023 for Nassau County’s legislative districts dilutes the voting strength of Black, Latino, and Asian residents and is gerrymandered for partisan advantage in violation of the NYVRA and the MHRL. -
ArizonaNov 2024
Voting Rights
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. RicherAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. Richer
We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights ActCivil Rights Groups Respond to Flawed Trial Court Opinion on New York Voting Rights Act
ORANGE COUNTY, Calif. — On November 7, a New York State Supreme Court trial judge issued an opinion striking down the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York (NYVRA). Today, the Legal Defense Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York American Civil Liberties Union, and Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law issued the following statement in response to the ruling: “The NYVRA is unquestionably constitutional, and protects the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by helping to ensure voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process. “The Nov. 7 decision by a state trial judge is deeply flawed and plainly incorrect. We fully expect the decision to be reversed on appeal. It flies in the face of basic legal principles and constitutes a stunning overreach in striking down the entire law, including provisions that are not at issue in the case. “To put it simply, the NYVRA does not discriminate, it bans discrimination – and in doing so protects New Yorkers’ most fundamental right. “New York is stronger when everyone has an equal opportunity to vote.”