The ACLU Teamed Up With a Community of Brooklyn Dancers to Create a ‘Know Your Rights’ Video for Stop and Frisk Encounters
When people hear “stop and frisk”, many different scenarios may come to mind. This can include a scenario where someone is doing something illegal. So, let me be clear at the outset. The ACLU doesn’t oppose police stops when someone is doing something illegal. The ACLU, however, is concerned about the police stopping people who are doing nothing illegal and where that stop infringes on their rights.
We oppose stops by police when they are made because of the color of someone’s skin, or the way they dress, or because a police officer thinks a person doesn’t belong where they are. In the absence of illegal acts, these stops themselves are illegal. Rather than uphold the rule of law, they subvert it. They place the rights, freedoms, and lives of innocent people in jeopardy.
Anyone who tells you that we can make a community safer by stopping innocent people and harassing them is selling you a lie. But there is a way to combat warrantless stop and frisk: knowing your rights. And there are novel ways to spread this knowledge, including dance.
%3Ciframe%20allowfullscreen%3D%22%22%20frameborder%3D%220%22%20height%3D%22315%22%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2F20Z9fRrAXgo%3Fautoplay%3D1%26version%3D3%22%20width%3D%22560%22%3E%3C%2Fiframe%3E
Privacy statement. This embed will serve content from youtube.com.
(DANCE RULES EVERYTHING AROUND ME), founded in 2011 by Reggie Gray and Jason Cust, is a community-oriented dance company rooted in a Brooklyn-born street dance style called flexing. These dancers tell the stories of their lives, their neighborhoods, the injustices they experience through moves like pauzin,’ connecting, get low, and bone breaking.
, “Flexing is a means of expression for people who feel like we don’t have a voice.” And one thing THE D.R.E.A.M. RING wanted to express was the pain and frustration of interacting with police.
Members of THE D.R.E.A.M. RING grew up in areas of Brooklyn where stops and frisks are a way of life. Knowing how to act and what rights they have during those stops was a critical step in preventing interactions they had with police from escalating.
Calvin Hunt, a D.R.E.A.M. RING dancer, knows this from experience.
One time he was in Brownsville, Brooklyn, getting off the subway when a police car rolled up to him. When the officers got out, Calvin immediately put up his hands and told them in a calm voice:
“You see both of my hands. You don't have to do anything unnecessarily. I'm not reaching for nothing. But, before you do ask me anything, and I tell you that I don't have to talk to you, my wallet, my ID, my work ID and everything is in my jacket pocket. If you need it, you can ask me to take it out and I'll take it out. No problem.”
Calvin believes if he didn’t act the way he did, the officers would have thrown him on the ground. “Knowing your rights saves your life,” he says.
As a way of empowering themselves and others, the company’s members impart what they’ve learned not only through this video but in around the world and in after school programs across New York City.
In this video, they teach the basics everyone should follow when confronted by an officer intent on stopping and frisking them:
Move slowly, with your hands always in sight, to give police less of a justification for physical abuse, which can neutralize the all-too-familiar police narrative that “it looked like he was reaching for something so I shot him.” Ask for a lawyer and assert your right to remain silent to help prevent police from twisting your words. Ask if you are free to leave. This may require an officer to admit that they have no reason to stop you at all. And, while refusing consent to search may not prevent an officer from searching you, it may raise serious questions about the legality of that search later on if you go to court.
Knowing and exercising your rights is not about confronting or physically resisting police officers. It is about surviving what could be a deadly confrontation. Sadly, acting intelligently and in accordance with the law during a police stop does not insure nothing bad will happen to you. Philando Castile had a permit for his gun, he told the officer he was armed, and he tried to produce his I.D. when he was ordered to do so. He was then shot and killed by police.
The reality of policing in America is grim, especially in communities of color. But against a backdrop of excessive force and racial profiling, knowing your rights still stands out as your best tool for protecting yourself. THE D.R.E.A.M RING knows this from their first-hand experiences, and they’re doing their part to spread the word. Join them and us.
Learn More About the Issues on This Page
-
Press ReleaseDec 2024
Racial Justice
ACLU Statement on House AI Task Force ReportACLU Statement on House AI Task Force Report
WASHINGTON — Today, the House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence (AI) issued its final report, marking an important step in recognizing the serious risks of discrimination and bias posed by AI systems — particularly in law enforcement’s use of facial recognition technology. The report recognizes that discrimination and bias may arise in AI systems due to their design, training data, or failures by end users. The report also investigates the complex considerations around deepfakes, open AI systems, and free speech, and urges Congress to pass narrow legislation to address concrete harms. In response to the House AI Task Force final report, Cody Venzke, senior policy counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, issued the following statement: “The ACLU commends the Task Force for recognizing that AI systems are harming people right now through discriminatory outcomes and supercharged surveillance. Curbing those abuses of AI is not a partisan issue, and more concrete action is needed to protect civil rights, while maintaining states’ authority to build on those protections. The Task Force is appropriately cautious when wrestling with issues around deepfakes, open-source AI, digital identity, and other issues, recognizing that legislators should consider a wide array of tailored tools to address real, not speculative, harms while respecting civil rights and civil liberties.” The House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence report can be found here. -
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Racial Justice
Human Rights
Why the Fight for Racial Justice is a Human Rights IssueWhy the Fight for Racial Justice is a Human Rights Issue
On International Human Rights Day, the ACLU is advocating for a long-sought after reparatory justice to end the continued abuses against Black and brown communities. -
Press ReleaseOct 2024
National Security
+2 Issues
ACLU Warns that Biden-Harris Administration Rules on AI in National Security Lack Key ProtectionsACLU Warns that Biden-Harris Administration Rules on AI in National Security Lack Key Protections
WASHINGTON — The Biden-Harris administration today released its National Security Memorandum on Artificial Intelligence (AI), establishing guidelines for how the U.S. government uses AI in national security programs, such as counterterrorism, intelligence, homeland security, and defense. The use of AI to automate and expand national security activities poses some of the greatest dangers to people’s lives and civil liberties. Agencies are increasingly exploring the use of AI in decisions about who to surveil, who to stop and search at the airport, who to add to government watchlists, and even who is a military target. While the government’s policy includes some important steps forward — such as requiring national security agencies to better track and assess their AI systems for risks and prohibiting a subset of dangerous AI uses — it falls far short in other critical areas, leaving glaring gaps with respect to independent oversight, transparency, notice, and redress. The policy imposes few substantive safeguards on a wide range of AI-driven activities, by and large allowing agencies to decide for themselves how to mitigate the risks posed by national security systems that have immense consequences for people’s lives and rights. As we have repeatedly seen before, this is a recipe for dangerous technologies to proliferate in secret. “Despite acknowledging the considerable risks of AI, this policy does not go nearly far enough to protect us from dangerous and unaccountable AI systems. National security agencies must not be left to police themselves as they increasingly subject people in the United States to powerful new technologies,” said Patrick Toomey, deputy director of ACLU’s National Security Project. “If developing national security AI systems is an urgent priority for the country, then adopting critical rights and privacy safeguards is just as urgent. Without transparency, independent oversight, and built-in mechanisms for individuals to obtain accountability when AI systems err or fail, the policy’s safeguards are inadequate and place our civil rights and civil liberties at risk.” For years, the American Civil Liberties Union has been urging far stronger safeguards and transparency about the AI tools that national security agencies are deploying, the rules constraining their use, and the dangers these systems pose to fairness, privacy, and due process. -
Press ReleaseOct 2024
Racial Justice
ACLU Comment on the Department of Labor’s AI Guidelines for Employers and VendorsACLU Comment on the Department of Labor’s AI Guidelines for Employers and Vendors
WASHINGTON — Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) released a roadmap for artificial intelligence (AI) best practices, designed to ensure that emerging technologies such as AI enhance job quality, benefit workers, and comply with existing employment laws when they are used in the workplace. The best practices, pursuant to President Biden’s executive order on the development and use of AI, include recommendations for AI system developers and employers that prioritize workers’ experiences and empowerment throughout the entire AI lifecycle – from design to use and oversight. These practices also call on employers and developers to create standards and processes to identify and mitigate risks from AI systems, such as threats to health and safety, civil rights, privacy, fair labor rights, and labor organizing prior to a developer marketing them or an employer deploying them, and recommend turning to different systems when sufficient mitigation is not possible. “We applaud DOL for issuing best practices for use of AI that center workers’ empowerment, civil rights, privacy, and safety protections and call on developers and employers to adopt critical guardrails in developing, procuring and using AI systems. Employers and developers should take note, as many have been burying their heads in the sand on their risk of legal liability with respect to AI tools,” said Olga Akselrod, senior staff attorney of the ACLU Racial Justice Program. “Following these best practices for AI can help employers and developers ensure that they do not violate existing civil rights and other employment laws that protect workers.” The best practices also recommend transparency measures through conducting and publishing impact assessments, notice and recourse for impacted workers, and measures to minimize worker displacement. The DOL also stated that employers should minimize electronic monitoring and avoid unnecessary collection or retention of worker data.