吃瓜大本营

The ACLU鈥檚 first LGBTQ rights case was 33 years before trans women of color led the riot against police brutality and anti-LGBTQ harassment at Stonewall.

We look back at some of the pivotal moments in the ACLU鈥檚 work to advance equality and justice for LGBTQ people and the work that remains today.

Lillian Hellman鈥檚 stage play The Children鈥檚 Hour was nearly banned in Boston because of 鈥榣esbian content.鈥� The ACLU鈥檚 challenge of the attempt to ban the play sparked public conversations about LGBTQ people in public life and led to future victories.

A decade before Stonewall, 87 people were arrested for being 鈥渓ewd and dissolute鈥� at a bar in Pacifica. Local council of the ACLU appeared on behalf of some of the people in court.

The ACLU filed Scott v. Macy on behalf of Bruce Scott, a federal worker who was forced to resign under the suspicion that he was gay. In 1965, a federal appeals court ruled in his favor.

The San Francisco Police Department tried to shut down a New Year鈥檚 Eve 1964 fundraiser dance for the newly-formed Council on Religion and the Homosexual, one of the nation鈥檚 first faith-based LGBTQ rights groups. Police attempted to scare patrons away with floodlights and cameras and multiple 鈥渇ire inspections鈥� and when event organizers asked to be shown a warrant police responded by arresting them. The ACLU defended the organizers at a trial, where the jury took only 10 minutes to return a unanimous verdict of not guilty. The raid, the surrounding publicity, and the subsequent trial led to unprecedented changes: the appointment of a special liaison between the police department and the gay community and the formation of an LGBTQ community hotline to report police abuse.

In the early fall of 1967, the Los Angeles police cracked down on the performances of Sir Lady Java, a Black trans woman from Louisiana, at the Redd Foxx Club. Invoking Rule No. 9, which made it illegal for performers to 鈥渋mpersonat[e] by means of costume or dress a person of the opposite sex,鈥� the police threatened to arrest the owner of Redd Foxx if Sir Lady Java ever again got up on the club鈥檚 stage. The ACLU threatened to sue over the rule but the club owner was unwilling to be a plaintiff. Sir Lady Java continued to publicly protest the rule and ultimately another lawsuit declared the rule unconstitutional.

While 鈥淒on鈥檛 Ask, Don鈥檛 Tell鈥� wouldn鈥檛 be repealed for another four decades, the ACLU first challenged a ban on gay service members on behalf of Richard Schlegel in Schlegel v. U.S.

A same-sex couple in Minnesota, Richard Baker and James Michael McConnell, applied for a marriage license and were denied by county officials. Their challenge, Baker v. Nelson, went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court but was dismissed 鈥渇or want of a substantial federal question.鈥�

Leaders of the modern LGBTQ rights movement, including philanthropist and first openly-gay U.S. ambassador James C. Hormel, formed what has become the LGBTQ & HIV Project. One week later the Supreme Court upheld Georgia鈥檚 sodomy law criminalizing consensual sex. The loss in Bowers v. Hardwick did not stop founding director Nan Hunter from fighting in the courts and in communities for LGBTQ people and those living with HIV.

On August 21, 1989, Dee Farmer, a Black trans woman, sued prison officials after being raped in a maximum security men鈥檚 federal prison. On June 6, 1994, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Farmer v. Brennan that Dee Farmer鈥檚 case against the prison could move forward. Tens of thousands of subsequent court decisions have cited Dee鈥檚 case and the legal standard it established.

The ACLU, along with Lambda Legal, blocked a Colorado constitutional amendment that would have stripped lesbian, gay and bisexual people of civil rights protections. The decision in Romer v. Evans is the first victory for LGB nondiscrimination protections at the Supreme Court.

The rise of digital speech created new opportunities for government censorship. In ACLU v. Reno, the Supreme Court struck down a law that could have prevented LGBTQ people from being represented on the Internet.

Diane Schroer was a retired Army Colonel who was denied a position with the Library of Congress after her future supervisor learned she is transgender. The victory in Schroer v. Library of Congress has meant that trans people are protected from discrimination in the workplace under federal law.

Constance McMillen and her girlfriend wanted to attend prom together and wear tuxedos. After the ACLU sent a letter to the school, the district canceled prom and created an alternative event for every student but Constance. Ultimately, the school district settled the lawsuit, McMillen v. Itawamba County School District, and changed their policies.

After 33 years and four court challenges, a court ruled (In re: Gill) that Florida鈥檚 ban on adoption by gay people was unconstitutional, allowing our client Martin Gill to adopt the foster children he had been raising for years.

Edie Windsor and Thea Spyer shared their lives together as a couple in New York City for 44 years. On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in U.S. v. Windsor that it was unconstitutional for the federal government, under section three of the so-called 鈥淒efense of Marriage Act,鈥� to treat married same-sex couples as though they were unmarried for purposes of over 1,100 federal programs and protections.

骋补惫颈苍鈥檚 lawsuit against the Gloucester County School Board for adopting an anti-trans bathroom policy helped spark a national conversation about trans people in public life. Now graduated, Gavin still waits for a decision in his case, and for his school to treat him as the man he is.

Jim Obergefell spent 22 years of his life with John Arthur. When John died, Jim was handed a death certificate with no surviving spouse listed. His fight to have his marriage recognized struck down state bans on marriage equality across the country when the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges.

The ACLU鈥檚 fight, along with Lambda Legal, against anti-trans bathroom policies continues in Carca帽o v. Cooper. The notorious law was replaced by HB 142. A settlement in this case was approved in July, 2019.

Aimee Stephens worked in funeral services for nearly three decades when she told her employer that she is a woman. A federal appeals court ruled in 2018 that her firing was unlawful sex discrimination. This fall, the Supreme Court will hear Aimee鈥檚 case and decide whether or not to roll back critical protections for LGBTQ people.

Six transgender service members, as well as six individuals who want the opportunity to serve in the military and are transgender are challenging the Trump administration鈥檚 military ban in Stone v. Trump.

David Mullins and Charlie Craig were turned away from Masterpiece Cakeshop because they are gay. While ruling for the bakery due to concerns specific to the case, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the core principle that businesses open to the public must be open to all in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.

Alina Boyden and Shannon Andrews are two state employees who were denied medically necessary care because they are transgender. A Wisconsin jury sent the state a bill for discriminating against Alina and Shannon.

With financial and on-the-ground support from the ACLU, voters in Alaska and rejected transphobia and voted to keep nondiscrimination protections for transgender people.

In a victory for transgender students, the Supreme Court declined to hear Doe v. Boyertown Area School District. With the action, the court allowed school districts to support transgender students by allowing them to use the restrooms that match their gender identity.

Aimee Stephens was fired from her job as director of a Michigan Funeral Home because she is transgender. On October 8, 2019, her case was heard before the Supreme Court.

In May, the U.S. House of Representatives passed landmark civil rights legislation advocated by the ACLU, the Equality Act. This bill would provide LGBTQ people with comprehensive, explicit protection against discrimination. This vote marked the first time in U.S. history that a chamber of Congress had passed comprehensive civil rights legislation for LGBTQ people.

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of ACLU clients Aimee Stephens and Don Zarda, as well as Gerald Bostock, in saying that it is unlawful to fire someone for being LGBTQ. Sadly, Aimee Stephens and Don Zarda did not live to see this victory.

Shortly after Idaho became the first state to pass a law banning trans student athletes, Boise State student Lindsay Hecox sued the state. In August of 2020, a federal judge blocked Idaho from implementing this discriminatory law.

In October of 2020 the ACLU released 鈥淚s Sex Work Decriminalization the Answer? What the Research Tells Us鈥� as part of a growing campaign to decriminalize sex work nationwide. The analysis reflects what transgender women and sex workers have been saying for decades: laws criminalizing sex work hurt public health and public safety.

President Biden revoked President Trump鈥檚 ban on transgender people from serving in the military within a week of taking office. On day one the Biden administration also issued an executive order fully implementing the decision in Bostock in all areas of the federal government.

The ACLU launches a campaign asking the Biden administration to issue an executive order to make it easier for trans and non-binary people to have accurate federal IDs. The ACLU鈥檚 campaign includes the ACLU鈥檚 largest-ever advertising campaign on transgender justice and largest ad campaign targeting the White House on an LGBTQ issue.

The ACLU鈥檚 work will continue for generations to come thanks to a generous contribution from Jon L. Stryker and Slobodan Randjelovi膰. Located in the Ruth Bader Ginsburg Center for Liberty, the Stryker and Randjelovi膰 LGBTQ & HIV Project will continue the ACLU鈥檚 work for LGBTQ rights in courts and communities around the country.

In June 2021, the Supreme Court again ruled there is no constitutional license to discriminate. There court did say that Philadelphia violated the rights of a taxpayer-funded foster care program when it refused to renew a contract due to specific language in the contract. The agency, Catholic Social Services, sought a ruling that would have allowed taxpayer-funded agencies to turn away not just LGBTQ people but people who are Jewish, Muslim and Mormon as well.