吃瓜大本营

As summer ends, the country鈥檚 political eyes are focusing even more intently on midterm elections. Although a new Congress is not far away, there remain major budgetary issues to resolve. The most immediate deadline for people concerned about President Trump鈥檚 immigration policies is September 30, when fiscal year 2018 ends.

For the Department of Homeland Security, reports that both parties prefer to postpone debating a new budget until after the midterms, although President Trump has on occasion threatened a government shutdown if he doesn鈥檛 get billions of dollars for immigration enforcement including more of his border wall. The ACLU鈥檚 position is clear: Congress must not reward DHS鈥� grossly abusive immigration enforcement with more resources to tear more families apart and to keep building a harmful, wasteful monument to Trump鈥檚 xenophobia.

After a year filled with DHS-inflicted trauma on separated children, continuing Border Patrol and racial profiling, plus rampant Immigration and Customs Enforcement and deportation , the only discussion in Congress should be about how much spending to cut from these ill-performing, family-destroying DHS components.

Yet both the House and Senate homeland security budget bills would enable DHS with more resources. The House version more than 400 ICE personnel and allocates $5 billion for Trump鈥檚 wall , while the Senate version includes 375 new Border Patrol agents and $1.6 billion for wall construction. Neither bill reduces the obscene and unnecessary spending level for .

The House committee vote split along party lines, but Democrats were divided in the Senate committee despite denunciations like Sen. (D-N.M.), who criticized the border fence as 鈥渁 waste of money鈥� and called attention to the children 鈥渃ruelly separated from their parents鈥� by the president and still awaiting reunion.

It鈥檚 now up to the full House and Senate, especially party leadership, to reject these committee votes and deny DHS more funding. Three financial aphorisms lay out why:

Follow the Money

Taxpayer dollars are the lifeblood of Trump鈥檚 deportation machine. For years DHS鈥檚 immigration enforcement budget has grown without adequate scrutiny, the budgets of the FBI, DEA, Secret Service, and all other federal criminal law enforcement agencies combined. Since 1986, about $300 billion has gone to federal immigration enforcement, leading to concerns about excessive border-security spending even before Trump.

鈥淚t is a sort of a mini industrial complex syndrome that has set in there,鈥� former House Appropriations Chair (R-Ky.) warned back in 2012. 鈥淎nd we're going to have to guard against it every step of the way.鈥�

These days, all caution has been thrown to the wind. Prior administrations, at least, sometimes balanced family unity and ties to the United States against deportation. Trump鈥檚 and Customs and Border Protection, on the other hand, have made separating families their goal. DHS is also allowing private prison companies to , in the words of the Migration Policy Institute, by asking for vast of immigration jail beds despite using current facilities to imprison asylum seekers illegally and subject families with children to .

DHS conducts out-of-control enforcement because its budget reins and oversight haven鈥檛 been held tightly by Congress. Every year, ICE and CBP keep pushing the limits of their budget 鈥� often receiving record levels of funding from Congress. What incentive does DHS have to comport with the Constitution if Congress annually rewards the agency with billions of dollars despite rampant abuses?

There is no clearer report card to send a department like DHS than reducing its budget in response to immoral, unconstitutional policies and actions.

Don鈥檛 Throw Good Billions After Bad

The Government Accountability Office monitors whether taxpayer funds are being properly spent. In a devastatingly critical report last month, GAO that:

鈥淒HS plans to spend billions of dollars developing and deploying new barriers along the southwest border. However, by proceeding without key information on cost, acquisition baselines, and the contributions of previous barrier and technology deployments, DHS faces an increased risk that the Border Wall System Program will cost more than projected, take longer than planned, or not fully perform as expected."

Trump鈥檚 rhetorical frenzies are fueling border wall construction, not reality.

To appease Trump, this Congress has already allocated more than $2 billion toward wall building and yet hasn鈥檛 even received a required DHS report on the $1.6 billion in construction approved in March. The wall鈥檚 wastefulness hasn鈥檛 gone unnoticed in Congress.

鈥淪ince DHS picked locations for the President鈥檚 wall before taking into account effectiveness or cost, any more spending on Trump's wall would be a giant waste of taxpayer money and may not provide any measurable security benefit,鈥� House Homeland Security Ranking Member Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) said, reacting to the GAO鈥檚 findings. 鈥淚 urge my colleagues to read this report before allowing another dime be spent on the President's pet project and costly boondoggle.鈥�

The Buck Stops Here

Rep. Thompson is right that his colleagues bear ultimate responsibility for DHS鈥� budget, so all of us must make one thing clear to Congress: Giving Trump鈥檚 DHS billions more in enforcement resources for the president鈥檚 cruel detention and deportation machine is unacceptable.