The US Must Follow Through on Its Promises to Protect the Victims of Modern-Day Slavery
Modern-day slavery exists within our borders, and victims come from some of the most marginalized communities in the United States and abroad. What’s more, U.S. policies continue to make it easy for their employers to keep them vulnerable, underpaid, and silent.
The State Department’s annual "," released Monday, tracks and evaluates forced labor and exploitation in 188 countries. It acknowledges that the U.S. continues to be a major hub for human trafficking for forced labor. In part, this is perpetuated by serious flaws in migrant visa programs, allowing companies to lure migrant workers here with promises of lucrative employment and a path to citizenship. Instead, many are forced into horrific labor conditions, cheated out of adequate compensation, and threatened with deportation, or worse, their lives, if they complain.
Yet the State Department claims to be in full compliance with its anti-trafficking commitments, listing as evidence various social programs, immigration relief, and criminal prosecutions. The reality is starkly different.
For example, the report highlights a landmark case that the Southern Poverty Law Center, ACLU, and others litigated against a marine industry company, Signal International, that brought over 500 workers from India on the government’s H-2B guestworker visa program. Assured that they were actually paying for lawful permanent residence, these men pawned off their belongings to pay exorbitant recruiting fees and travel to worksites in Mississippi and Texas. There, they were shuttled into labor camps, where they faced unhygienic living conditions, constant noise from the worksites, and no privacy. One of the camp managers wrote in his journal that the workers were “dropping with sickness like flies.” When some of the men began to organize and examine their options for suing Signal, the company seized them and locked them in a trailer, telling them they were fired and would be deported.
After a four-week trial filed on behalf of five of the guestworkers before U.S. District Judge Susie Morgan, the jury found Signal liable for every claim brought against it. The workers were awarded $14 million in compensatory and punitive damages, making this one of the largest human trafficking cases in U.S. history.
David v. Signal exposes one of the many gaps in U.S. protections against labor trafficking – gaps that make it possible for companies to lie to foreign workers, abuse them here with little to no oversight, and keep them debt-ridden and stranded with no chance of escaping or seeking gainful employment elsewhere. The State Department’s report fails to acknowledge this blatant lack of regulatory supervision.
As part of its stated , our government must do more to protect migrant laborers – to ensure that hardworking immigrants who support U.S. industries and economic interests retain the right to dignity and fair compensation.
The fix is simple.
More effective mechanisms must be put into place to identify and assertively prosecute employers who charge extortionate recruiting fees, illegally confiscate workers’ passports, and put them through exploitative working conditions. Workers need the freedom to exercise their right to report abuses without fear of retaliation. And they need to be able to exit the contracts they were manipulated into signing and to pursue other employment and permanent residence in the United States.
Companies just like Signal continue to cheat their vulnerable employees out of what they deserve every day. One court case can’t bring down the entire system of migrant worker exploitation. If the U.S. is serious about its efforts to eliminate forced labor, it must address these issues at the root.
“The vast majority of trafficked persons,” said Maria Grazia Giammarinaro, U.N. special rapporteur on trafficking in persons, , “are not recognized as such, and as a result do not have access to justice and remedies.”
The State Department identifies migrant workers, children, people of color, LGBT individuals, people with disabilities, and homeless individuals as particularly vulnerable to forced labor and exploitation. It correctly identifies the lack of a victim-centered approach to justice — trafficking victims, including children, are often criminally prosecuted for their connection to illicit activity. This injustice persists in both sex trafficking and labor exploitation, and it must be addressed with robust new policy.
This year’s report indicates some self-reflection on the part of the government, which is a start. But today, on World Day Against Trafficking in Persons, we must demand that U.S. leadership do more to protect those who most need it most. Freedom from slavery is a human right.
Learn More About the Issues on This Page
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Human Rights
Failed War on Drugs Policies Won't Stop the Overdose Crisis, But Harm Reduction Can Save LivesFailed War on Drugs Policies Won't Stop the Overdose Crisis, But Harm Reduction Can Save Lives
Research shows extensive benefits from syringe exchange and other harm reduction programs. But misguided efforts to ban common sense care continue. -
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Racial Justice
Human Rights
Why the Fight for Racial Justice is a Human Rights IssueWhy the Fight for Racial Justice is a Human Rights Issue
On International Human Rights Day, the ACLU is advocating for a long-sought after reparatory justice to end the continued abuses against Black and brown communities. -
Press ReleaseOct 2024
Human Rights
Free Speech
Universities Should Protect Students’ Right to Protest, End Crackdown on Peaceful ProtestsUniversities Should Protect Students’ Right to Protest, End Crackdown on Peaceful Protests
WASHINGTON – College and university presidents across the U.S. need to respect and protect the right to protest in support of Palestinian rights the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch said today in an open letter. For months the organizations have raised concerns about the potential use of unlawful force when university administrators call in law enforcement officers to break up demonstrations on campus. This new letter comes after reports of heavy-handed and excessive force by some campus police and local law enforcement against peaceful protests and encampments across the country. The groups provide recommendations for colleges and universities to ensure they protect the right to protest on their campuses. The organizations also urge university administrations to refrain from taking any further measures to suppress student protests on campus, including stopping the use of so-called less lethal weapons and ensuring that coercive police power is used only as a last resort, among other recommendations. “Universities are responsible for protecting both physical safety and free expression on campus,” said Jamil Dakwar, director at the ACLU’s Human Rights Program. “It’s deeply concerning to see universities needlessly expose students to police violence for peacefully expressing their political opinions. We’re urging schools once again to exercise restraint, practice de-escalation, and protect free speech and dissent on campus.” Preliminary analysis by Amnesty International’s Digital Verification Corps has identified at least 174 photos, videos, or social media posts from 20 universities of potential excessive use of force by law enforcement under international law that merits further investigation. This includes 17 universities where chemical irritants such as pepper spray appear to have been used against student protesters, and 11 universities where officers appear to have responded to protests armed with kinetic impact projectiles such as rubber bullets. The results of this use of force by law enforcement agencies have been devastating, including media-verified reports of severe injuries such as bleeding puncture wounds, head injuries, broken teeth, and suspected broken bones, most notably at the University of California Los Angeles, Columbia University, and the City College of New York. The Digital Verification Corps also documented at least 10 other universities where photos or videos capture potential injuries to students. It found that half of the incidents involving injuries under investigation appear to be the result of chemical irritants. “The information we have gathered on excessive use of force against student protesters is extremely worrisome and we are still in the beginning of our investigation,” said Justin Mazzola, researcher with Amnesty International USA. “With the continuation of the Israeli military’s assault on Gaza and the risk of US complicity through the sending of weapons, campus protests in favor of stopping the violence and destruction will continue. Universities have a responsibility to protect academic freedom and the rights to freedom of expression, and to peacefully protest, and we will be watching to ensure they do.” The ACLU, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch are not alone in their concern. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, and several UN experts, including the UN special rapporteur on the right to education, have criticized the violent crackdown on peaceful demonstrators by law enforcement and disciplinary measures against students exercising their rights to peaceful assembly and freedom of expression. All higher education institutions, even private colleges and universities, where the First Amendment is not applicable, have a responsibility to respect the right to freedom of peaceful assembly under international law. “Instead of resorting to police action that both shuts down free speech and heightens the risk of injuries, universities need to do more to protect student speech from violence and intimidation, and actively ensure that peaceful student expression continues without interference,” said Tanya Greene, director of the US program at Human Rights Watch. As the letter explains, the ACLU, Amnesty International USA, and Human Rights Watch are conducting research and analysis of how campus administrators are responding to student protests. They urge universities to fulfill their human rights responsibilities by facilitating protests and ensuring that all students' rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, regardless of viewpoint, is respected. A comprehensive joint report on this issue is slated to be released by the ACLU and Amnesty International USA in the coming months. The open letter is available here: /documents/letter-to-universities-student-protesters -
News & CommentaryOct 2024
Immigrants' Rights
Human Rights
Three Ways the Media Introduces Bias to the Immigration DebateThree Ways the Media Introduces Bias to the Immigration Debate
Ahead of the election, we examined how political ads and news media stories depict the immigration debate as more negative than it may be.