The company wanted its workers to get the message that they would not have "free rein when they decide that they want to run." This echo of the bondage of centuries past was in an email between managers at Signal International, the Alabama-based industrial ship manufacturing and repair giant.
They were writing about 500 guest workers from India, legally employed at Signal as welders and pipefitters with H-2B temporary work visas, but illegally subjected to fraudulent recruitment practices, squalid living conditions, and threats of serious harm.
Last week, in an effort to pursue long-delayed justice, three of America's largest law firms filed lawsuits against Signal on behalf of many of these men, and at least five more major law firms have agreed to represent many more. In an unprecedented pro bono collaboration, the firms will collectively represent more than 200 former guest workers in these suits, which charge that the men were subjected to forced labor and fraud that rose to the level of racketeering and human trafficking.
The filings come as Congress considers comprehensive immigration reform, including an expansion of the foreign worker program that risks extending the very problems that took place at Signal. Legislators should take a close look at the story of Signal's Indian guest workers, because any future foreign worker program must be designed to ensure that this type of human trafficking is put to an end.
It was March 2007. Over 500 men from India had arrived at Signal's shipyards in Texas and Mississippi. They came on H-2B guest worker visas, but had been promised green cards - permanent residency - for themselves and their families. They paid dearly for these promises and a chance at the "American Dream" - going into debt to pay as much as $20,000 in recruitment fees, the equivalent of years of wages in India.
But when they arrived, the vision of a good life in the United States with their families was replaced by the squalor of an overcrowded, fenced-in, guarded labor camp. They were forced to live in unsanitary, racially segregated trailers where as many as 24 men shared only two toilets - and they were required to pay $1,050 per month each for these accommodations, even if they wanted to live somewhere else. The promises of green cards turned out to be lies. A group of outspoken workers was rounded up, locked in a guarded room, and told by Signal that they would be deported as an "example" to the other workers.
The following year, the workers, represented by our organizations and co-counsel, brought a class-action lawsuit against Signal. The court later ruled that our case could not be brought as a class action for procedural reasons, and now, the men who are no longer part of our lawsuit have decided to file individual cases against Signal.
The Signal story is not an isolated aberration - the structure of the U.S. guest worker programs invites abuse. Foreign recruitment networks often prey on the vulnerable. These recruiters need not register with the government, agree to follow U.S. law, or honestly disclose the terms of the job to their recruits. There is no U.S. government oversight of these recruiters and no accountability for the American companies that hire the workers they lie to.
Guest workers' visas tie them to a single employer - no matter how bad things are. If the guest workers abandon their jobs (or "abscond," as federal immigration authorities call it), they must choose to either return to their home country in crippling debt, or join the ranks of the nation's undocumented workers. As merely "guests" in our nation, they are an underclass that is here purely as labor without humanity, to be removed under color of law when their job is done.
But there are ways to fix the current system. Employers should bear the costs of recruitment, visas and transport, so that guest workers do not arrive under mountains of debt. Once here, they should have the ability to leave abusive employers and seek other U.S. employment without worrying about getting arrested and deported.
To enforce these rules, there must be robust oversight of labor recruiters and accountability for employers who hire them. This means giving the foreign workers an unequivocal right to bring their recruiters and employers to court for abuses and broken promises, and access to lawyers to make this right meaningful.
Finally, guest workers and their families must also have a path to permanent residency and eventual citizenship. That's fair and would guarantee basic human dignity for all involved.
After learning of the flaws in the existing program, Congressman Charles Rangel said, "This guestworker program's the closest thing I've ever seen to slavery."
He is correct, and to ensure that other workers don't have to endure the same abuse that the Signal workers did, we must stop treating guest workers like disposable commodities.
Learn more about human trafficking and other civil liberty issues: Sign up for breaking news alerts, , and .
Learn More About the Issues on This Page
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Human Rights
Failed War on Drugs Policies Won't Stop the Overdose Crisis, But Harm Reduction Can Save LivesFailed War on Drugs Policies Won't Stop the Overdose Crisis, But Harm Reduction Can Save Lives
Research shows extensive benefits from syringe exchange and other harm reduction programs. But misguided efforts to ban common sense care continue. -
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Racial Justice
Human Rights
Why the Fight for Racial Justice is a Human Rights IssueWhy the Fight for Racial Justice is a Human Rights Issue
On International Human Rights Day, the ACLU is advocating for a long-sought after reparatory justice to end the continued abuses against Black and brown communities. -
Press ReleaseOct 2024
Human Rights
Free Speech
Universities Should Protect Students’ Right to Protest, End Crackdown on Peaceful ProtestsUniversities Should Protect Students’ Right to Protest, End Crackdown on Peaceful Protests
WASHINGTON – College and university presidents across the U.S. need to respect and protect the right to protest in support of Palestinian rights the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch said today in an open letter. For months the organizations have raised concerns about the potential use of unlawful force when university administrators call in law enforcement officers to break up demonstrations on campus. This new letter comes after reports of heavy-handed and excessive force by some campus police and local law enforcement against peaceful protests and encampments across the country. The groups provide recommendations for colleges and universities to ensure they protect the right to protest on their campuses. The organizations also urge university administrations to refrain from taking any further measures to suppress student protests on campus, including stopping the use of so-called less lethal weapons and ensuring that coercive police power is used only as a last resort, among other recommendations. “Universities are responsible for protecting both physical safety and free expression on campus,” said Jamil Dakwar, director at the ACLU’s Human Rights Program. “It’s deeply concerning to see universities needlessly expose students to police violence for peacefully expressing their political opinions. We’re urging schools once again to exercise restraint, practice de-escalation, and protect free speech and dissent on campus.” Preliminary analysis by Amnesty International’s Digital Verification Corps has identified at least 174 photos, videos, or social media posts from 20 universities of potential excessive use of force by law enforcement under international law that merits further investigation. This includes 17 universities where chemical irritants such as pepper spray appear to have been used against student protesters, and 11 universities where officers appear to have responded to protests armed with kinetic impact projectiles such as rubber bullets. The results of this use of force by law enforcement agencies have been devastating, including media-verified reports of severe injuries such as bleeding puncture wounds, head injuries, broken teeth, and suspected broken bones, most notably at the University of California Los Angeles, Columbia University, and the City College of New York. The Digital Verification Corps also documented at least 10 other universities where photos or videos capture potential injuries to students. It found that half of the incidents involving injuries under investigation appear to be the result of chemical irritants. “The information we have gathered on excessive use of force against student protesters is extremely worrisome and we are still in the beginning of our investigation,” said Justin Mazzola, researcher with Amnesty International USA. “With the continuation of the Israeli military’s assault on Gaza and the risk of US complicity through the sending of weapons, campus protests in favor of stopping the violence and destruction will continue. Universities have a responsibility to protect academic freedom and the rights to freedom of expression, and to peacefully protest, and we will be watching to ensure they do.” The ACLU, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch are not alone in their concern. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, and several UN experts, including the UN special rapporteur on the right to education, have criticized the violent crackdown on peaceful demonstrators by law enforcement and disciplinary measures against students exercising their rights to peaceful assembly and freedom of expression. All higher education institutions, even private colleges and universities, where the First Amendment is not applicable, have a responsibility to respect the right to freedom of peaceful assembly under international law. “Instead of resorting to police action that both shuts down free speech and heightens the risk of injuries, universities need to do more to protect student speech from violence and intimidation, and actively ensure that peaceful student expression continues without interference,” said Tanya Greene, director of the US program at Human Rights Watch. As the letter explains, the ACLU, Amnesty International USA, and Human Rights Watch are conducting research and analysis of how campus administrators are responding to student protests. They urge universities to fulfill their human rights responsibilities by facilitating protests and ensuring that all students' rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, regardless of viewpoint, is respected. A comprehensive joint report on this issue is slated to be released by the ACLU and Amnesty International USA in the coming months. The open letter is available here: /documents/letter-to-universities-student-protesters -
News & CommentaryOct 2024
Immigrants' Rights
Human Rights
Three Ways the Media Introduces Bias to the Immigration DebateThree Ways the Media Introduces Bias to the Immigration Debate
Ahead of the election, we examined how political ads and news media stories depict the immigration debate as more negative than it may be.