吃瓜大本营

Unlike most police departments nationwide, the Minneapolis Police Department has taken an important step toward becoming more transparent and accountable to the communities it serves.

On August 9, it launched a that allows the public to access raw data from certain stops, including suspicious person and traffic stops, that officers make. The data set goes back to November 1, 2016, and, as promised, has been updated every 24 hours since launch. The data is searchable by race, gender, location of the stop, whether a search occurred, and more.

In its month of operation, the database has given the people of Minneapolis some insight into how officers spend their time on the city鈥檚 streets. In August, for instance, the police reported stopping 4,082 people, handing out citations 16 percent of the time. This data also shows that Black and Native American Minneapolitans make up a disproportionate number of stops far exceeding their population size. Black people make up around 36 percent of people stopped but are only 18 percent of the population, while Native Americans are 4 percent of the stops but only account for 2 percent of the population. The disparities could be even greater because race was marked unknown for 24.4 percent of the people stopped.

With access to data like this, police reform activists and concerned residents will be in a better position to ask the mayor鈥檚 office and police chief why such disproportionate stops continue to be the norm and press for reform.

Collecting and making such data accessible to the public is, regrettably, far too rare for police departments nationwide.

The ACLU, along with allied organizations, has long advocated for police departments to increase their data collection and transparency. The Minneapolis Police Department has now stepped up, giving law enforcement organizations nationwide an example to follow. But it wasn鈥檛 easy.

In May 2015, the ACLU released a report analyzing low-level arrest data from Minneapolis. The results showed that African-Americans and Native Americans are over 8 times more likely to be arrested for low-level offenses than whites. That report, however, could not analyze patterns in police stops because the Minneapolis Police Department did not track stops, only arrests. This was a critical gap in monitoring police practices, particularly since communities of color have long reported unjustified police stops and harassment.

After we published the report, we pushed the Minneapolis department to track data on stops and regularly release the data to the public. Thanks to of the local police conduct oversight commission, the police department started tracking the data in late 2015, but it took another year and half of pressure to make it publicly accessible.

Collecting and making such data accessible to the public is, regrettably, far too rare for police departments nationwide. This kind of transparency should be mandatory for public servants who derive their power from us. In examining the largest 50 police departments around the country we found that only eight make data on stops public. Minneapolis is slightly smaller than any of these departments, but we included them for comparison sake. Of those eight, only Minneapolis is updating data daily and allows the data to be searchable by location and race. You can see where your city stacks up here.

Publicly accessible data won鈥檛 eliminate racial disparities or end excessive uses of force, but it will help the community hold the police accountable for their actions and be more effective in advocating for reforms within police departments, like those in our report. Continuous data collection and analysis will make it easier to identify systematic problems and provide evidence on the kinds of reforms that have impact.

Minneapolis鈥檚 new program should set a standard for data transparency for other police departments around the country.