On the Agenda: December 12–16, 2011
Today we’re debuting a new feature on the blog that tells you what’s coming up in civil liberties this week. We’ll include legislative action our Washington Legislative Office (WLO) is keeping an eye on, activity in our litigation and other noteworthy events.
On the Hill, Congress is busy trying to jam through bad bills while they hope no one is looking. One in particular we’re watching very closely: the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2012, which could be reported out of conference this week and could be on the floor in both houses of Congress for final passage. Read our blog post about the NDAA and be sure to watch our new video, in which Sen. Lindsay Graham tells Americans: “Shut up! You don’t get a lawyer!”
Also this week, the House Homeland Security Committee is expected to introduce new cybersecurity legislation this week.
Monday, December 12
LGBT Rights: Today we’re filing a motion in our military separation pay case, Collins v. U.S. This is a class action lawsuit challenging the Defense Department’s discriminatory practice of giving military personnel discharged for “homosexuality” only half of the separation pay they are entitled to after an honorable discharge. Tellingly the government is too embarrassed to actually defend the constitutionality of the policy in open court, so they filed an Answer that refused to give a response to our allegations. We are asking the court for them to file a proper answer that actually requires them to admit or deny our allegations about the policy.
Medical Marijuana: The Criminal Law Reform Project will be in U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona defending the right of thousands of sick Arizonans to access important medicine by arguing for the dismissal of Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer’s lawsuit challenging her own state’s medical marijuana law. We represent the Arizona Medical Marijuana Association (AzMMA).
Tuesday, December 13
Voting Rights: Attorney General Holder will deliver a speech on voting rights titled “Protecting our Democracy, Protecting the Right to Vote” at the LBJ Presidential Library & Museum in Austin, Texas. WLO Director Laura W. Murphy and Senior Legislative Counsel Deborah J. Vagins will attend. Laura will blog her thoughts on the speech Wednesday.
Criminal Code Overhaul: Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Subcommittee (Chairman Sensenbrenner, R-Wis.) of House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the Criminal Code Modernization and Simplification Act of 2011 (H.R. 1823).
Wednesday, December 14
FBI Oversight: The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold an oversight hearing on the FBI. FBI Director Robert Mueller is expected to testify.
Foreign Law/Religious Law Bans: The House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on the Constitution will hold a hearing titled “Judicial Reliance on Foreign Law.”
Refusals/Trafficking: The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform will hold a hearing entitled, “HHS and the Catholic Church: Examining the Politicization of Grants (minority day of hearing)” at 1:30 pm.
Thursday, December 15
First Amendment: A markup of the Stop Online Piracy Act (H.R. 3261), a bill intended to protect copyrighted material online, is tentatively scheduled for today. While the ACLU believes it’s important to protect copyrighted material online, the narrowly tailored language of SOPA is severely flawed and will lead to the takedown of lawful content. Urge your members of Congress to oppose SOPA.
Also, tonight, GOP presidential candidates will debate in Sioux City, Iowa.
We hope you find “On the Agenda” helpful, and if you have any comments/suggestions, let us know at ideas@aclu.org.
Learn more about your rights: Sign up for breaking news alerts, , and .
Learn More About the Issues on This Page
-
News & CommentaryDec 2024
Civil Liberties
We Need to Know More About State Supreme Court CasesWe Need to Know More About State Supreme Court Cases
State Supreme Courts interpret laws that impact some of the most intimate parts of our lives. Communities have a right to know what’s on the docket. -
Press ReleaseDec 2024
Civil Liberties
New ACLU Report Reveals Most State Supreme Courts Fail to Meet Key Transparency MeasuresNew ACLU Report Reveals Most State Supreme Courts Fail to Meet Key Transparency Measures
NEW YORK — Nearly half of all state supreme courts across the country fail to regularly post new cases they are considering, with only six meeting four key transparency measures already implemented by the U.S. Supreme Court, according to a new report published today by the American Civil Liberties Union. The report identifies significant steps that state supreme courts should take to inform the public about their cases, which have only grown in importance as the federal judiciary has become more hostile to protecting core rights and advocates have turned to state protections and state court litigation in response. Based on an analysis of the practices and policies of the highest courts in each state, including D.C., the report “Scorecard for State Supreme Court Transparency: How Does Your State Stack Up?” ranks each state supreme court in five tiers based on compliance with four key transparency measures. These measures include posting new cases online in a timely manner, providing timely information about legal issues presented by cases, making dockets accessible and free for the public, and making merits briefing accessible and free for the public. “State courts regularly hear — and are the final word on — cases affecting abortion rights, voting rights, criminal justice reform, and more. Yet, in many instances, the highest state courts do not provide meaningful public access to information about cases affecting the rights and liberties of millions of people. We urge state supreme courts to bring more transparency to the critical work they do,” said Julie Murray, co-director of the ACLU’s State Supreme Court Initiative. “In the face of a federal judiciary increasingly unwilling to protect core rights and an incoming administration that threatens to exacerbate that problem, state courts are an important defense for our liberty. They should be leaders in transparency, too,” said Bridget Lavender, Skadden Fellow with the Initiative. The report emphasizes that state courts “play an outsized role” in many parts of the law, but their ability to “guard our liberties depends in significant part on whether those courts adopt transparent processes.” It further highlights that state supreme courts have led the way on enormously consequential decisions in recent years. In particular, some state supreme courts have recognized the right of same sex couples to marry, and did so long before federal courts. They have also declared the death penalty unconstitutional under state law despite contrary federal law, protected access to reproductive health care as a right even as that right was being stripped away at the federal level, and provided more robust protection to people subject to unreasonable searches and seizures. The report urges state supreme courts to take action to improve their transparency practices, taking notes from the courts that have already implemented these measures. It notes that regularly posting new cases and the issues they represent, and providing timely access to dockets and merits briefing allows the public, the press, and the legal community to track cases as they unfold, identify cases with statewide consequences, and understand what’s at stake. -
Press ReleaseNov 2024
National Security
+2 Issues
ACLU Urges House to Kill Bill that Could Give Trump Admin Power to Crush Dissent and Go After Political EnemiesACLU Urges House to Kill Bill that Could Give Trump Admin Power to Crush Dissent and Go After Political Enemies
WASHINGTON — The American Civil Liberties Union strongly urges the House of Representatives to vote NO on H.R. 9495, the Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act, which would grant Donald Trump and his handpicked secretary of the Treasury power to investigate and effectively shut down any tax-exempt organization — including news outlets, universities, and civil society groups — by stripping them of tax-exempt status based on an unilateral accusation of wrongdoing. “Passing this bill would hand the incoming Trump administration a dangerous new tool it could use to stifle free speech, target political opponents, and punish disfavored groups,” said Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU. “The freedom to dissent without fear of government retribution is a vital part of any well-functioning democracy, which is why Congress must block H.R. 9495 before it’s too late.” While there is a 90-day “cure” period in which a designated nonprofit can mount a defense, it is a mere illusion of due process. The government may deny organizations its reasons and evidence against them, leaving the nonprofit unable to rebut allegations. This means that a nonprofit could be left entirely in the dark about what conduct the government believes qualifies as "support," making it virtually impossible to clear its name. Last month, the ACLU and a diverse array of over 130 other tax-exempt organizations — including human rights, reproductive health, and immigrants’ rights groups — wrote to Congress urging them to vote no. The letter also explains that the groups do not oppose the provisions in H.R. 9495 that relate to preventing the IRS from imposing fines and penalties on hostages while they are held abroad. Indeed, these provisions have already passed the Senate on their own, and if the House of Representatives were to pass a version of this bill that did not include the text of H.R. 6408, it could be sent immediately to President Biden for his signature. -
News & CommentaryNov 2024
Civil Liberties
Donald Trump Will Return to the White House in January. The ACLU is Ready.Donald Trump Will Return to the White House in January. The ACLU is Ready.
Starting in 2016, the ACLU filed more than 400 legal actions against Trump and his administration. As Trump returns to the White House, we’re ready to return to the courts and Congress to fight for our civil liberties.