吃瓜大本营

U.S. law enforcement is greatly expanding its use of surveillance drones, and private actors are also seeking to use the technology for personal and commercial use.

Drones have many beneficial uses, including in search-and-rescue missions, scientific research, mapping, and more. But deployed without proper regulation, drones equipped with facial recognition software, infrared technology, and speakers capable of monitoring personal conversations would cause unprecedented invasions of our privacy rights. Interconnected drones could enable mass tracking of vehi颅cles and people in wide areas. Tiny drones could go completely unnoticed while peering into the window of a home or place of worship.

厂耻谤惫别颈濒濒补苍肠别听聽have been the subject of fierce debate among both legislators and the public, giving rise to an impressive amount of state legislation鈥攑roposed and enacted鈥攖o protect individuals鈥� privacy. Uniform rules should be enacted to ensure that we can enjoy the benefits of this new technology without bringing us closer to a 鈥渟urveillance society鈥� in which our every move is monitored, tracked, recorded, and scrutinized by the government.

The ACLU recommends the following safeguards:

• Usage Limits: A drone should be deployed by law enforcement only with a warrant, in an emergency, or when there are specific and articulable grounds to believe that the drone will collect evidence relating to a specific criminal act.
• Data Retention: Images should be retained only when there is reasonable suspicion that they contain evidence of a crime or are relevant to an ongoing investigation or trial.
• Policy: Usage policy on drones should be decided by the public鈥檚 representatives, not by police departments, and the policies should be clear, written, and open to the public.
• Abuse Prevention and Accountability: Use of domestic drones should be subject to open audits and proper oversight to prevent misuse.
• Weapons: Domestic drones should not be equipped with lethal or non-lethal weapons.