³Ô¹Ï´ó±¾Óª

Challenging Detention Without a Bond Hearing Pending Removal Proceedings (February 2018)
Practice Advisory: Prolonged Detention Challenges after Jennings v. Rodriguez (March 2018)
Practice Advisory: Parole of Arriving Asylum Seekers who have Passed Credible Fear,ÌýDamus v. NielsenÌý(July 2018)
Practice Advisory: Constitutional Challenges to Mandatory Immigration Detention AfterNielsen v. PreapÌý(July 2019)

Eleventh Circuit

• (June 2016)

Ninth Circuit

• Practice Advisory: BondÌýHearing and Ability-to-Pay Determinations in the Ninth Circuit Under Hernandez v. SessionsÌý(October 2017)
• Practice Advisory: Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Diouf v. Napolitano (April 2011)
• Practice Advisory: Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Casas-Castrillon v. Department of Homeland SecurityÌý(ACLU of Southern California, September 2008)
• Practice Advisory:ÌýImmigration Judges’ Authority to Grant Release on Conditional Parole Under INA § 236(a) as an Alternative to Release on a Monetary Bond: Rivera v. Holder (September 2015)

Third Circuit

• Practice Advisory: Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility:ÌýGerman Santos v. WardenÌý(August 2020)
• Practice Advisory: Bond Hearings for Individuals Subject to Prolonged Detention: Guerrero-Sanchez v. Warden, York County PrisonÌý(October 2018)

Fourth Circuit

• Practice Advisory: Bond Hearings in Baltimore Immigration Court Under Dubon Miranda V. BarrÌý(July 2020)