Trump v. Vance
What's at Stake
Whether President Trump should comply with a grandy jury subpoena and hand over his personal finance documents.
Summary
In Trump v. Vance, the ACLU also argues that Trump does not have the right to absolute immunity from a grand jury subpoena for similar documents simply because of his office. The subpoenas, directed to his accountant for personal financial records, impose no burden on his official duties. No previous president has asserted such complete immunity as Trump has. The Supreme Court should enforce the subpoenas.
The amicus curiae brief for Trump v. Vance is filed in conjunction with the New York Civil Liberties Union and authored by former ACLU Legal Director Steven R. Shapiro and Sam Shapiro of Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP.
Legal Documents
-
03/04/2020
Trump v. Vance: ACLU Amicus Brief
Support our on-going litigation and work in the courts