Trabelsi v. Crawford, et al. – Lawsuit Challenging Unlawful Detention and Inhumane Treatment of Acquitted Man
What's at Stake
Our client, Nizar Trabelsi, is in the United States against his will. The federal government brought him here from Belgium more than a decade ago and charged him with terrorism-related crimes. At trial, the government’s case failed: a federal jury found Mr. Trabelsi not guilty. But instead of allowing Mr. Trabelsi to return to Belgium after his acquittal, the United States placed him in highly restrictive immigration detention and began an ongoing effort to force him to Tunisia, where he was born and where he will very likely be tortured.
Mr. Trabelsi’s detention violates the Constitution, immigration law, and the extradition treaty between the United States and Belgium. Through this lawsuit, he seeks to return to Belgium, and he demands an immediate improvement of his detention conditions.
Summary
In 2013, Nizar Trabelsi, a Tunisian national, was forcibly extradited from Belgium to face criminal charges in the United States, where he spent nearly 10 years in solitary confinement awaiting trial. In July 2023, he was by a federal jury. Yet, instead of allowing Mr. Trabelsi to return to Belgium, the United States government transferred him to immigration detention, wrongly treating him as an ineligible applicant for admission and subject to deportation proceedings. Despite the Belgian government’s multiple formal diplomatic requests to facilitate his return to Belgium, in conformity with Belgian court orders, the federal government has made clear that it intends to deport Mr. Trabelsi to Tunisia, where he is likely to face torture. In an immigration proceeding in which the ACLU is not counsel, an immigration judge ruled that the government could not deport Mr. Trabelsi to Tunisia because he faced a high risk of torture there; the government has appealed that ruling to the Board of Immigration Affairs.
On August 28, 2024, the ACLU, with co-counsel from the ACLU of Virginia and the University of Chicago Law School’s Immigrants’ Rights Clinic, on Mr. Trabelsi’s behalf. This lawsuit challenges the government’s authority to detain Mr. Trabelsi as an ineligible applicant for admission to the United States, arguing that the U.S. government must return Mr. Trabelsi to Belgium immediately. The lawsuit argues that his detention violates the U.S.-Belgium Extradition Treaty, U.S. immigration law, and the Constitution. It also seeks immediate improvements to Mr. Trabelsi’s detention conditions.
On December 2, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruled that the court does not have jurisdiction to decide whether the government can continue to detain Mr. Trabelsi. This ruling means that the United States will continue to hold him in immigration detention as it continues its attempt to deport him to Tunisia.
Legal Documents
-
08/28/2024
Petitioner's Habeas Petition and Complaint for Injunctive Relief -
09/25/2024
Petitioner's Motion for Issuance of Order to Show Cause -
09/26/2024
Order Granting Motion for Issuance of Order to Show Cause -
10/10/2024
Government's Response to Order to Show Cause -
10/17/2024
Petitioner's Reply in Support of Habeas Petition -
11/08/2024
Government's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment -
-
11/08/2024
Government's Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment
Trabelsi v. Crawford, et al. – Lawsuit Challenging Unlawful Detention and Inhumane Treatment of Acquitted ManLegal DocumentsGovernment's Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary JudgmentDate Filed: 11/08/2024
Court: District Court (E.D. Va.)
Affiliate: Virginia
-
11/08/2024
-
11/08/2024
Defendant Jeffrey Crawford's Answer to Habeas Petition and Complaint -
11/22/2024
Petitioner's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Combined Motions to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment -
12/02/2024
Memorandum Opinion and Order on Habeas Claims -
12/06/2024
Government's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Time to Conduct Discovery -
12/12/2024
Petitioner's Reply in Support of His Motion for Time to Conduct Discovery
Date Filed: 08/28/2024
Court: District Court (E.D. Va.)
Affiliate: Virginia
Date Filed: 09/25/2024
Court: District Court (E.D. Va.)
Affiliate: Virginia
Date Filed: 09/26/2024
Court: District Court (E.D. Va.)
Affiliate: Virginia
Date Filed: 10/10/2024
Court: District Court (E.D. Va.)
Affiliate: Virginia
Date Filed: 10/17/2024
Court: District Court (E.D. Va.)
Affiliate: Virginia
Date Filed: 11/08/2024
Court: District Court (E.D. Va.)
Affiliate: Virginia
Date Filed: 11/08/2024
Court: District Court (E.D. Va.)
Affiliate: Virginia
Date Filed: 11/22/2024
Court: District Court (E.D. Va.)
Affiliate: Virginia
Date Filed: 12/02/2024
Court: District Court (E.D. Va.)
Affiliate: Virginia
Date Filed: 12/06/2024
Court: District Court (E.D. Va.)
Affiliate: Virginia
Date Filed: 12/12/2024
Court: District Court (E.D. Va.)
Affiliate: Virginia
Press Releases
Federal Judge Rejects Acquitted Man’s Argument That His Immigration Detention Is Unlawful
ACLU Files Lawsuit Challenging U.S. Government’s Unlawful Detention and Inhumane Treatment of Acquitted Man