Peña-Rodriguez v. State of Colorado
What's at Stake
Whether a court may consider evidence of racially discriminatory comments during jury deliberations in deciding whether to grant a new trial.
Summary
The validity of a verdict generally cannot be questioned based on testimony by jurors about their deliberations. The purpose of the so-called no-impeachment rule is to preserve the confidentiality of the jury process. The issue in this case is whether that rule must give way to the constitutional requirement of an impartial jury when there is direct evidence of racial bias by one or more jurors. In an amicus brief filed with other civil rights groups, the ACLU argues that rooting out discrimination in the criminal justice system is more important than the no-impeachment rule.
Legal Documents
-
07/01/2016
Peña-Rodriguez v. State of Colorado - Amicus Brief
Peña-Rodriguez v. State of ColoradoLegal Documents
Peña-Rodriguez v. State of Colorado - Amicus Brief
Date Filed: 07/01/2016
Support our on-going litigation and work in the courts