吃瓜大本营

The ACLU found that hundreds of students 鈥� some as young as 7 years old 鈥� were being charged under far-reaching and nebulous 鈥渄isturbing schools鈥� and 鈥渄isorderly conduct鈥� laws for behaviors such as loitering, cursing, or undefined 鈥渙bnoxious鈥� actions on school grounds. The statutes also had a chilling effect on students who spoke out against policing abuses in schools. Black girls and boys were nearly four times as likely to be targeted under the law.

The ACLU challenged the statues on grounds they violate the U.S. Constitution鈥檚 due process protections. The complaint, Kenny v. Wilson, was filed in the U.S. District Court of South Carolina.

Our plaintiffs included:

• Niya Kenny, 19, a former student at Spring Valley High School in Columbia. As a student, she witnessed a violent, headline-grabbing altercation in her classroom when a school resource officer flipped a classmate over her desk and dragged her across the room. Kenny, who is African-American, spoke up against the officer鈥檚 actions. She was arrested and hauled off to a detention center.
• Taurean NeSmith, 21, an African-American student at Benedict College in Columbia, was arrested because he criticized a police officer for racial profiling during the stop of a fellow student.
• S.P., 15, a white student with behavioral and emotional disabilities at Travelers Rest High School in Greenville, was charged with a crime after failing to comply with instructions to leave the school library and cursing at a student who was making fun of her.
• D.S., 17, an African-American student who has learning disabilities and a heart condition at Stall High School in Charleston, was charged with disturbing school after a minor physical altercation. In the adult criminal justice system, she faced possible detention for her inability to pay fines and fees.
• Girls Rock Charleston, a nonprofit organization that provides mentorship, music and arts education, and leadership development to young people in Charleston. Girls Rock operates an afterschool program serving at-risk youth and youth who have been involved in the criminal justice system.

On February 23, 2023, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court decision that South Carolina 鈥渄isturbing school鈥� laws were unconstitutional, reaffirming that subjecting students to harsh criminal penalties interferes with their future in education and contributes to racial disparities.

The laws failed to provide students notice of what behaviors might expose them to criminal charges and lacked sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrary or discriminatory enforcement. These laws were enforced in a grossly discriminatory way against Black students and students with disabilities.

This decision should be instructive to the many school districts across the country where students continue to be charged with 鈥榙isorderly conduct鈥� and similar vague crimes.